Teams

Green-Zwemke

2024 One Doubles · 4.5 Women

3 players · average NTRP 4.5 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 4.10 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.17
Yuko Hopman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.09
Rebecca Yu
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.05
Mary Green-Zwemke
published 4.5
Results8 ties
2024-08-03Won 10
W#1 DoublesMary Green-Zwemke / Yuko Hopman vs Cynthia McPhee / Darci Keljo6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2024-07-21Won 10
W#1 DoublesMary Green-Zwemke / Rebecca Yu vs Mary Hlady / Raini Spitze6-4, 6-0
2024-07-17Won 10
W#1 DoublesMary Green-Zwemke / Rebecca Yu vs Lisa Handley / Darci Keljo6-3, 6-4
2024-06-30Lost 01
L#1 DoublesMary Green-Zwemke / Rebecca Yu vs Kerstin Anderson / Nicole Partch6-1, 6-1
2024-06-26Lost 01
L#1 DoublesRebecca Yu / Yuko Hopman vs Annie Duong / Grace Lee7-6, 6-2
2024-06-22Lost 01
L#1 DoublesMary Green-Zwemke / Rebecca Yu vs Sandra Barnes / Jennifer Benedict6-2, 6-4
2024-06-15Lost 01
L#1 DoublesYuko Hopman / Rebecca Yu vs Jennifer Benedict / Rachel Montagne6-3, 6-2
2024-06-09Won 10
W#1 DoublesMary Green-Zwemke / Rebecca Yu vs Mary Hlady / Raini Spitze6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4.5
Yuko Hopman
116W–79L career
1%99%0%
4.17
4.5
Rebecca Yu
64W–49L career
4%96%0%
4.09
4.5
Mary Green-Zwemke
79W–32L career
7%93%0%
4.05

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.