Teams

Team Morgan (CONFIRMED)

USTA Atlanta Summer - Combo Doubles 18 & Over Qualifier · 7.5 Women (Harrison Tennis Center)

10 players · average NTRP 3.75 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-08-09vs Team Rowell (CONFIRMED)Won 21
L#1 DoublesMichelle McIntosh / Jill Ponce vs Lindsey Ferguson / Monica Fleury5-8
W#2 DoublesKaren Zaro / Valerie Briggman vs Regina Drollette / Tiffany Rowell8-5
W#3 DoublesKathy Elliott / Icilma Morton vs Allyson Stabner / Lexey Chapin8-6
2025-08-09vs Team Harvey (CONFIRMED)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesIcilma Morton / Kathy Elliott vs Amanda Harvey / Kris Bleiler6-8
W#2 DoublesShawndelle Carter / Kelly Wilson vs Courtney Potkey / Deryl Heflin8-1
L#3 DoublesMary Saye / Charlotte Sjoberg vs Kristie Cowan / Anita Davis4-8
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Women (Harrison Tennis Center) have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.62 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.13
Charlotte Sjoberg
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.73
Joyce Morgan
published
3.61
Michelle McIntosh
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.59
Mary Saye
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.54
Valerie Briggman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.53
Shawndelle Carter
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.52
Icilma Morton
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.49
Analise Moseley
published 3.5
3.40
Jill Ponce
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Karen Zaro
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Icilma Morton + Valerie Briggman13363% games+11.2% vs expected
Shawndelle Carter + Valerie Briggman6266% games+8.1% vs expected
Shawndelle Carter + Jill Ponce4162% games+7.3% vs expected
Shawndelle Carter + Icilma Morton3252% games+0.4% vs expected
Icilma Morton + Jill Ponce134 matchesnot enough data
Jill Ponce + Analise Moseley314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Charlotte Sjoberg
20W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%18%82%
4.13
Joyce Morgan
13W–3L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.73
Michelle McIntosh
6W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.61
Mary Saye
57W–46L career · 1 line in 2025
27%73%<1%
3.59
Valerie Briggman
45W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%40%60%
3.54
Shawndelle Carter
26W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%41%59%
3.53
Icilma Morton
48W–23L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%46%54%
3.52
3.5
Analise Moseley
21W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%53%47%
3.49
Jill Ponce
17W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%75%24%
3.40
Karen Zaro
6W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.