Teams

BC - MiraCosta/AnneDeMartini

2022 SOCAL Doubles - Beach Cities · BC Women - 3.5

17 players · average NTRP 3.36 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-12-04vs BC - PVTC/JanetYoungLost 01
L#3 DoublesLisa Drexinger / Judy Chen vs Dolly Pham / Jessica Ke1-6, 6-4, 0-1
2022-11-06vs BC - Westchester/AllisonLangusLost 01
L#3 DoublesStephanie Rudy / Lisa Drexinger vs Kaleigh Malloy / Maria Starn6-7, 7-6, 0-1
2022-10-09vs BC - AltaVista/SondeeWolffWon 20
W#1 DoublesJoi Gillam / Joy Huffman vs Heidi Linscomb / Darin Nizich6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesLisa Drexinger / Christie Edman vs Veronica Deutsch / Lori Daniels7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2022-09-25vs BC - Kramer/TanyaDrawerLost 01
L#1 DoublesJulie Misch / Lisa Drexinger vs Colleen Post / Martha Zane7-5, 2-6, 0-1
2022-09-18Lost 01
L#3 DoublesAmanda West / Joy Huffman vs Ashley Cruse / Camille McDaniel4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesLisa Drexinger / Christie Edman vs Analisa Coria / Colleen Perry6-2, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for BC Women - 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
Pamela Lopez
published
3.67
Stephanie Rudy
published
3.36
Kristen Roath
published
3.35
Jennifer Morrow
published
3.28
Shannon Nicholson
published
3.25
Amanda West
published 3.5
Anne Lalas
published 3.5
Irina Goedemans
published 3.5
3.21
Mari Bellas
published
3.19
Amy Eastman
published 3.5
3.18
Lora Penczar
published
3.06
Joy Huffman
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.94
Joi Gillam
published
2.86
Lisa Drexinger
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published 3
2.76
Anne DeMartini
published 3
Linda Cronkite
published
Luan Smith
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Pamela Lopez
21W–8L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.81
Stephanie Rudy
4W–5L career · no lines in 2022
9%90%1%
3.67
Kristen Roath
5W–5L career · no lines in 2022
<1%85%14%
3.36
Jennifer Morrow
13W–8L career · no lines in 2022
<1%88%12%
3.35
Shannon Nicholson
1W–3L career · no lines in 2022
1%94%5%
3.28
3.5
Amanda West
13W–25L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Anne Lalas
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Irina Goedemans
1W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Mari Bellas
3W–4L career · no lines in 2022
5%93%1%
3.21
3.5
Amy Eastman
4W–10L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.19
Lora Penczar
6W–7L career · no lines in 2022
9%91%1%
3.18
3.5
Joy Huffman
39W–41L career · type A · 2 lines in 2022
33%67%<1%
3.06
Joi Gillam
1W–9L career · no lines in 2022
68%32%<1%
2.94
3
Lisa Drexinger
122W–173L career · 9 lines in 2022
<1%86%14%
2.86
3
Anne DeMartini
5W–12L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%3%
2.76
Linda Cronkite
5W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Luan Smith
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.