Teams

LVTA YELLOW

2026 ITA MIXED - NOCO · MIXED 7.5 - ITA - NOCO

8 players · average NTRP 3.70 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-08-16vs LT MAROONLost 01
L#3 DoublesJared Habein / Sonda Huhta vs Michelle Peyton / Jonathan Koester4-6, 6-7
2026-08-12vs MLF REDLost 02
L#2 DoublesAmy Ritchie / Kendal Sanders vs Channing Gessler / Dan Gessler4-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#3 DoublesSonda Huhta / Jared Habein vs Karen Trevino / David Trevino6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2026-08-02vs LVTA PURPLESplit 11
W#2 DoublesJared Petersen / Dawn Petersen vs Josephine Bikos / Dan Bikos3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKendal Sanders / Amy Ritchie vs Hailey Swanbom / Ronald McKenzie6-3, 1-6, 0-1
2026-07-26vs MLF ORANGELost 02
L#1 DoublesKendal Sanders / Amy Ritchie vs Gordon Beck / Alli Lackey4-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesDawn Petersen / Adam Less vs Darcy Peters / Tyler Hempstead3-6, 3-6
2026-07-25vs LT MAROONLost 02
L#2 DoublesAdam Less / Dawn Petersen vs Alana Tutt / Tyler Barbero4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJared Habein / Sonda Huhta vs Alison Earnhart / Luko Krnan7-6, 6-7, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MIXED 7.5 - ITA - NOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.57 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.88
Adam Less
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.84
Amy Ritchie
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.81
Sonda Huhta
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.77
Jared Petersen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.43
Jared Habein
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.34
Kendal Sanders
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.90
Dawn Petersen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Paige Woodard
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jared Petersen + Sonda Huhta4352% games−1.9% vs expected
Kendal Sanders + Amy Ritchie1644% games−4.7% vs expected
Jared Petersen + Dawn Petersen3545% games−9.9% vs expected
Paige Woodard + Jared Habein044 matchesnot enough data
Sonda Huhta + Jared Habein033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Adam Less
76W–47L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
3.88
4
Amy Ritchie
21W–19L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%86%13%
3.84
4
Sonda Huhta
86W–73L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%90%8%
3.81
Jared Petersen
19W–23L career · 1 line in 2026
2%92%5%
3.77
3.5
Jared Habein
48W–66L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%68%32%
3.43
Kendal Sanders
24W–35L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%87%12%
3.34
3
Dawn Petersen
70W–101L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%77%23%
2.90
Paige Woodard
0W–5L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.