Teams

Gagliardo/Rogers/SVCC

2024 Adult Singles 18 & Over · 3.0 Men

7 players · average NTRP 3.25 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-09-10vs Cockrell/Bentonville/MRCLost 02
L#1 DoublesJoseph Gagliardo / Josh Glickman vs Jared Culbert / Ryan Morris1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesBrendan Fitzpatrick / Douglas Raymond vs Lance Court / Keith Landrum0-6, 2-6
2025-01-28vs Gross/Lowell/MRCSplit 11
L#1 SinglesJoseph Gagliardo vs Ross Warnes0-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesTr Rose vs John Ciulla6-0, 6-0
2025-01-21vs Bailey/Fayetteville/FACWon 30
W#1 SinglesNicholaa Colucci vs Ronnie Adams6-4, 6-4
W#2 SinglesJoseph Gagliardo vs Jack Bailey6-2, 6-3
W#3 SinglesCarlos Ruink vs Elkin Javier Perez Arroyo6-3, 6-3
2025-01-20vs Jackson/Fayetteville/FACLost 02
L#2 SinglesJoseph Gagliardo vs Brandon Skinner5-7, 5-7
L#3 SinglesRichard Watkins vs Steven Adair3-6, 1-6
2024-12-09vs Patterson/Bentonville/MRCLost 03
L#1 SinglesTr Rose vs Keith Landrum1-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesCarlos Ruink vs Tom Hubbard5-7, 1-6
L#3 SinglesBrendan Fitzpatrick vs Grant Patterson4-6, 0-6
2024-11-19vs McLaughlin/Rogers/SVCCLost 12
L#1 SinglesNicholaa Colucci vs Deric Neal4-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesJoseph Gagliardo vs Jonathan Bricker6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 SinglesRichard Watkins vs Adam Daglow3-6, 2-6
2024-11-16vs Gabbard-Estes/Fayetteville/SRCSplit 11
L#1 SinglesBrendan Fitzpatrick vs Tyler Quattlebaum2-6, 1-6
W#3 SinglesJoseph Gagliardo vs Louis Schilberg7-5, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.82 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Carlos Ruink
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.09
Joseph Gagliardo
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published
2.99
Tr Rose
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
2.88
Nicholaa Colucci
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.75
Brendan Fitzpatrick
usually #3 Singles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.38
Richard Watkins
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
Mike Williams
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Joseph Gagliardo + Tr Rose3262% games+8.7% vs expected
Joseph Gagliardo + Brendan Fitzpatrick213 matchesnot enough data
Joseph Gagliardo + Nicholaa Colucci213 matchesnot enough data
Brendan Fitzpatrick + Tr Rose213 matchesnot enough data
Nicholaa Colucci + Tr Rose303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Carlos Ruink
2W–3L career · type S · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Joseph Gagliardo
37W–26L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%25%75%
3.09
Tr Rose
32W–18L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%54%46%
2.99
Nicholaa Colucci
34W–19L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%82%18%
2.88
3
Brendan Fitzpatrick
18W–21L career · 3 lines in 2024
3%95%2%
2.75
Richard Watkins
0W–7L career · 2 lines in 2024
81%19%<1%
2.38
Mike Williams
0W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.