Teams

BHSC - Cook Dommer

2026 Charlottesville Adult 18 & Over · Charlottesville Adult 18 & Over 2.5 Women

11 players · average NTRP 2.50 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-06-07vs BHSC - SwitzerSplit 11
L#1 DoublesRonda Ingersoll / Disha Venkatesan vs Sherry Lake / Jessica Kinnick5-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesVirginia Mcmillin / Amy Mcdonnell vs Kelly Owens / Kathryn Harris7-6, 7-6
2026-06-05vs ACAC - Odom 2.5Split 11
W#1 DoublesRonda Ingersoll / Ellen McAllister vs Wendi Cook / Lisa Christianson6-4, 6-0
L#2 DoublesLiane Houseknecht / Amy Mcdonnell vs Ann Hague / Diane Espinosa3-6, 3-6
2026-06-03vs ACAC - Odom 2.5Lost 02
L#1 DoublesLiane Houseknecht / Disha Venkatesan vs Ann Hague / Ann Jones0-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesChelsie Garriott / Amy Mcdonnell vs Danielle Coccomo / Wendi Cook2-6, 1-6
2026-05-20vs Farmington - Khodirev - Ladies 2.5Lost 12
L#1 DoublesJanel Kasparson / Abigail Cook Dommer vs Jeanette Wang / Susan Brooks2-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesDisha Venkatesan vs Lauren Holzman0-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesVirginia Mcmillin / Ronda Ingersoll vs Jennifer Keevil / Catharine Lentz6-3, 2-0
2026-05-17vs Glenmore - JohnstonLost 12
L#1 DoublesAnnette Lombard / Virginia Mcmillin vs Pam Socolow / Julie Nash3-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesIsabel Freisitzer vs Andrea Wilder6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesEllen McAllister / Chelsie Garriott vs Nerissa Rouzer / Kathleen Edwards0-6, 5-7
2026-04-29vs BHSC - SwitzerSplit 11
W#1 DoublesAnnette Lombard / Isabel Freisitzer vs Molly Switzer / Melissa Grossman6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesAbigail Cook Dommer / Sara Green vs Patricia Clifford / Sherry Lake6-4, 5-7, 0-1
W#1 DoublesSara Green / Ellen McAllister vs Claire Frantz / Jeanette Wang2-5
W#2 DoublesRonda Ingersoll / Chelsie Garriott vs Mimi Scully / Susan Brooks6-1, 7-5
2026-04-12vs Glenmore - JohnstonLost 12
L#1 DoublesAbigail Cook Dommer / Ellen McAllister vs Nerissa Rouzer / Kathleen Edwards4-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesAnnette Lombard vs Katie Sions6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesJanel Kasparson / Liane Houseknecht vs Pam Socolow / Ellen Schaff2-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · Charlottesville Adult 18 & Over 2.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1BHSC - Cook Dommer35111328221
2ACAC - Odom 2.535101432228
3Farmington - Khodirev - Ladies 2.52681633232

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.19 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.56
Isabel Freisitzer
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 17% · published
2.53
Annette Lombard
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 2.5
2.44
Ronda Ingersoll
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.24
Virginia Mcmillin
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.22
Chelsie Garriott
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.04
Ellen McAllister
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.03
Liane Houseknecht
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.03
Abigail Cook Dommer
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.02
Amy Mcdonnell
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.01
Disha Venkatesan
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
1.96
Janel Kasparson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Isabel Freisitzer
5W–1L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%33%67%
2.56
2.5
Annette Lombard
4W–1L career · type S · 5 lines in 2026
0%41%59%
2.53
Ronda Ingersoll
9W–11L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%66%34%
2.44
Virginia Mcmillin
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%97%3%
2.24
2.5
Chelsie Garriott
3W–2L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
0%98%2%
2.22
Ellen McAllister
3W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.04
Liane Houseknecht
1W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.03
2.5
Abigail Cook Dommer
1W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.03
2.5
Amy Mcdonnell
3W–5L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.02
Disha Venkatesan
1W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.01
Janel Kasparson
0W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.96

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.