Teams

FV:Chaos Queens:Yaffee/Nassar

2026 NCT Adult 18 & Over Women · 3.5 Women

25 players · average NTRP 3.56 / NORTHERN CONNECTICUT

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2026-03-28vs MLM:Match Points:Lincer/SheffieldSplit 22
L#1 DoublesKara Lightman Anthony / Judy Luce vs Ariana Korcz / Natong Lin6-7, 2-6
W#2 DoublesSaren Cassotto / Anna Namnoum vs Jennifer Rodriguez / Gail Sheffield4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 SinglesStephanie Dominello vs Rachel Bowe6-4, 3-4
W#3 DoublesHaley Kennedy / Taylor Radke vs Melanie Remillard / Melinda Smith7-6, 6-2
W#1 DoublesChristie Kania / Elyse Post Perez vs Anna Huttner / Linda Wright5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#1 SinglesMarissa Cerami vs Caitlin Richard3-6, 1-3
W#2 DoublesNay Nassar / Anna Namnoum vs Jeanne Larsen / Catherine Godin6-4, 6-2
L#2 SinglesMorgan Castrogiovanni vs Veronica Grubin6-7, 1-6
L#3 DoublesTaylor Radke / Emily Galati vs Sharon Farber / Nora Cosgrove0-6, 7-6, 0-1
2026-02-28vs RFL:All In:OrtWon 32
W#1 DoublesChristie Kania / Elyse Post Perez vs Jennifer Shiman / Erin Sloat7-5, 6-2
W#1 SinglesMarissa Cerami vs Marcie Danton4-6, 6-5
L#2 DoublesNay Nassar / Saren Cassotto vs Jenny Ort / Marisa Sullivan4-6, 5-7
L#2 SinglesStephanie Dominello vs Katelyn Damp2-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesHaley Kennedy / Taylor Radke vs Julie Walsh / Danielle Braun6-2, 6-1
W#1 DoublesElyse Post Perez / Christie Kania vs Susan Anderson / Lisa Aukerman6-1, 6-3
W#1 SinglesMarissa Cerami vs Laurie Philbin6-4, 6-0
W#2 DoublesAndrea Ravitz / Nay Nassar vs Kate Fawthrop / Sandra Mauro6-1, 6-2
W#2 SinglesDebbie Gritz Roitman vs Elizabeth Norman7-6, 4-3
L#3 DoublesLian Zheng / Anna Namnoum vs Marie Roncalli / Jana Roberts1-6, 1-6
W#1 DoublesElyse Post Perez / Christie Kania vs Susan Anderson / Sabine Schneider6-4, 6-1
W#1 SinglesMarissa Cerami vs Thip Kophengnavong6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesAllison Yaffee / Kara Lightman Anthony vs Carol MacColl / Marie Roncalli5-7, 1-6
L#2 SinglesBrittany Terranova vs Laurie Philbin4-6, 7-6
W#3 DoublesTaylor Radke / Emily Galati vs Sandra Mauro / Louise Sterling6-2, 6-2
W#1 DoublesKara Lightman Anthony / Judy Luce vs Leah Polansky / Sabrina Skenyon6-3, 1-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesMarissa Cerami vs KC Karasinski7-5, 6-1
W#2 DoublesAnna Namnoum / Lian Zheng vs Katherine Howard-Bender / Danielle Pierce6-3, 7-6
W#2 SinglesStephanie Dominello vs Yuly Susaya6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesHaley Kennedy / Saren Cassotto vs Rosa Kleopoulos / Adrienne Roach6-1, 7-6
2025-11-15vs MLM:Match Points:Lincer/SheffieldWon 50
W#1 DoublesElyse Post Perez / Allison Yaffee vs Elizabeth Heinze / Mary Sommers6-4, 7-5
W#1 SinglesMarissa Cerami vs Emily Riggs6-0, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJudy Luce / Anna Namnoum vs Maggie Piccirillo / Rachel Bowe5-7, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 SinglesKara Lightman Anthony vs Ariana Korcz6-1, 7-5
W#3 DoublesStephanie Dominello / Haley Kennedy vs Isabela Piza Danielsen / Brandy Little7-5, 6-4
L#1 DoublesEmily Galati / Nay Nassar vs Nora Cosgrove / Brenna McAllister2-6, 6-7
W#1 SinglesMarissa Cerami vs Veronica Grubin6-3, 6-0
L#2 DoublesSaren Cassotto / Anna Namnoum vs Jeanne Larsen / Linda Wright4-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesKara Lightman Anthony vs Frances Denote6-4, 5-6
L#3 DoublesCorey Zeilman / Taylor Radke vs Catherine Godin / Christine Meo3-6, 4-6
2025-10-25vs RFL:All In:OrtLost 14
W#1 DoublesElyse Post Perez / Christie Kania vs Jenny Ort / Jennifer Shiman6-0, 6-1
L#1 SinglesDebbie Gritz Roitman vs Marcie Danton6-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesCorey Zeilman / Nay Nassar vs Maureen Vaughn / Nan Flanagan2-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesKara Lightman Anthony vs Katelyn Damp6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesSaren Cassotto / Brittany Terranova vs Kristina Schumann / Julie Walsh2-6, 3-6
W#1 DoublesElyse Post Perez / Andrea Ravitz vs Danielle Pierce / Adrienne Roach6-1, 6-2
W#1 SinglesChristie Kania vs Leah Polansky6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesJudy Luce / Kara Lightman Anthony vs Janet Belval / KC Karasinski6-0, 6-3
W#3 DoublesAnna Namnoum / Saren Cassotto vs Tracy French / Neetu Rathore6-1, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings12 teams · 3.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1FV:Chaos Queens:Yaffee/Nassar010301638390
2BTC:Ace of Baseline:Cushman/Cosgrove010272043372
3MLM:Match Points:Lincer/Sheffield010262051462
4ETC:Traveling Circus:Philbin/Roncalli010242455446
5ERC:Volley Llamas:Belval/Karasinski01074183554
6PRC:Spinners:Rowe/Quaintance012411845421
7BSF:Double Shots:Abreu/Pietrantonio012401746425
8MRC:Bandak012342455471
9RH:Love Means Nuthin’:Jackson/Dolan012233271551
10GTC:Mid-Court Crisis:Moody/Bray012253375567
11FV:Net Assets:Bowman/Franklin012213678575
12GTC:All Set:Bonin/Fromson012164087616

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.18 estimated across 19 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.65
Christie Kania
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 4
3.56
Marissa Cerami
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
3.55
Andrea Ravitz
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.51
Elyse Post Perez
usually #1 Doubles 47%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.35
Judy Luce
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.32
Lian Zheng
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.31
Allison Yaffee
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Alison Kantesaria
published 3.5
Debbie Gritz Roitman
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.19
Nay Nassar
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
3.18
Anna Namnoum
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.13
Emily Galati
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.13
Brittany Terranova
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.07
Stacie Espeso
published
3.06
Kara Lightman Anthony
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
3.04
Haley Kennedy
usually #1 Doubles 46%, also #3 Doubles 46% · published
3.00
Saren Cassotto
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published
2.99
Corey Zeilman
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.97
Stephanie Dominello
usually #2 Singles 56%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published
2.91
Taylor Radke
usually #3 Doubles 46%, also #1 Doubles 27% · published
2.60
Morgan Castrogiovanni
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Elizabeth Diamond
published
Monica Hoffman
published
Samantha Lee
published
Zoe Badger
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nay Nassar + Emily Galati4167% games+16.7% vs expected
Judy Luce + Kara Lightman Anthony5161% games+13.4% vs expected
Elyse Post Perez + Andrea Ravitz6357% games+12.4% vs expected
Taylor Radke + Saren Cassotto8166% games+8.6% vs expected
Christie Kania + Andrea Ravitz6067% games+6.3% vs expected
Saren Cassotto + Haley Kennedy7159% games+6.2% vs expected
Elyse Post Perez + Allison Yaffee12357% games+6.1% vs expected
Christie Kania + Nay Nassar10459% games+5.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Christie Kania
89W–39L career · 10 lines in 2026
14%86%1%
3.65
Marissa Cerami
66W–34L career · 12 lines in 2026
<1%33%67%
3.56
3.5
Andrea Ravitz
48W–20L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%37%63%
3.55
Elyse Post Perez
93W–35L career · 15 lines in 2026
<1%48%52%
3.51
Judy Luce
53W–12L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%1%99%
3.35
Lian Zheng
55W–41L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
Allison Yaffee
37W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.31
3.5
Alison Kantesaria
39W–18L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
3.5
Debbie Gritz Roitman
14W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Nay Nassar
51W–38L career · 7 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.19
3.5
Anna Namnoum
80W–57L career · type A · 7 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
3.18
Emily Galati
31W–15L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%17%83%
3.13
3.5
Brittany Terranova
3W–16L career · 2 lines in 2026
17%82%<1%
3.13
Stacie Espeso
57W–62L career · no lines in 2026
32%68%<1%
3.07
Kara Lightman Anthony
40W–27L career · 9 lines in 2026
<1%34%66%
3.06
Haley Kennedy
25W–6L career · 11 lines in 2026
<1%37%63%
3.04
Saren Cassotto
44W–27L career · 10 lines in 2026
<1%51%49%
3.00
3.5
Corey Zeilman
61W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
53%47%<1%
2.99
Stephanie Dominello
42W–20L career · 9 lines in 2026
<1%58%42%
2.97
Taylor Radke
84W–54L career · 11 lines in 2026
<1%75%25%
2.91
Morgan Castrogiovanni
8W–23L career · 9 lines in 2026
25%75%<1%
2.60
Elizabeth Diamond
7W–21L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Monica Hoffman
13W–14L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Samantha Lee
6W–14L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Zoe Badger
12W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.