Teams

Liberty Park Volleydolls

2026 USTA Adult 18 & Over · 3.0W AM

15 players · average NTRP 2.90 / UTAH

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-05-27Lost 01
L#3 DoublesMegan Berceau / Stacy Higbee vs Mary Jane Swalberg / Maria Pettit2-6, 1-6
2026-05-20vs Park City Flying SquirrelsWon 10
W#2 DoublesRebecca Anderson / Anna Pearce vs Peony Keve / Kim Li2-6, 6-2, 1-0
2026-05-13Lost 01
L#1 SinglesRebecca Anderson vs Carrie Larsen2-6, 6-3, 0-1
2026-05-06vs Ivory Ridge-Supreme CourtLost 02
L#2 DoublesRebecca Anderson / MacY Bell vs Becky Nelson / Gayle Waldron2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesLiz Bell / Kassie Belcher vs Jill Broadbent / Mary Scoresby4-6, 6-7
2026-04-29vs Sports Mall TenistasWon 21
W#1 DoublesRebecca Anderson / Liz Baucom vs Aly King / Kiely Hanks6-1, 6-1
L#2 SinglesStacy Higbee vs Marci Mortensen2-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#3 DoublesLiz Bell / Marie Gardner vs Summer Adamson / Megan Ord6-0, 6-2
2026-04-22Won 10
W#2 SinglesRebecca Anderson vs Elaine Day6-2, 6-3
2026-04-08Lost 01
L#2 DoublesKelley Allred / Stacy Higbee vs Annie Mortensen / Shawna Smart1-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0W AM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.68 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.13
Nancy Orme
usually #1 Doubles 53%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
2.88
Mary Sorensen
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.87
Kelley Allred
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.81
Liz Baucom
usually #3 Doubles 31%, also #2 Doubles 23% · published 3
2.79
Megan Berceau
usually #3 Doubles 46%, also #2 Doubles 31% · published 3
2.78
Liz Bell
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.70
Rebecca Anderson
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
2.70
Erin Massey
usually #3 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.67
Anna Pearce
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
2.62
Keri Masson
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.62
Niki Evans
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.53
Stacy Higbee
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.49
MacY Bell
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
2.37
Kassie Belcher
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 2.5
2.31
Marie Gardner
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nancy Orme + Kelley Allred6078% games+17.4% vs expected
Erin Massey + Nancy Orme7361% games+12.2% vs expected
Erin Massey + Liz Bell8557% games+7.2% vs expected
Liz Baucom + Erin Massey9461% games+6.8% vs expected
Rebecca Anderson + Erin Massey4351% games+6.6% vs expected
Megan Berceau + Liz Bell6064% games+5.5% vs expected
Keri Masson + Nancy Orme4650% games+4.5% vs expected
Liz Baucom + Liz Bell9654% games+4.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Nancy Orme
65W–49L career · 14 lines in 2026
<1%15%85%
3.13
Mary Sorensen
43W–45L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
2.88
Kelley Allred
71W–58L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%84%16%
2.87
3
Liz Baucom
72W–55L career · 11 lines in 2026
1%92%7%
2.81
3
Megan Berceau
71W–78L career · 13 lines in 2026
1%93%6%
2.79
Liz Bell
48W–35L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
2.78
Rebecca Anderson
45W–63L career · 5 lines in 2026
6%93%1%
2.70
3
Erin Massey
61W–53L career · 9 lines in 2026
6%93%1%
2.70
3
Anna Pearce
53W–29L career · 6 lines in 2026
10%89%<1%
2.67
Keri Masson
48W–33L career · 4 lines in 2026
18%82%<1%
2.62
Niki Evans
52W–45L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%18%82%
2.62
Stacy Higbee
17W–21L career · 3 lines in 2026
42%58%<1%
2.53
MacY Bell
35W–44L career · 6 lines in 2026
53%47%<1%
2.49
2.5
Kassie Belcher
38W–67L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%85%15%
2.37
Marie Gardner
20W–38L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%93%7%
2.31

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.