Teams

Shirley/2.5/18&O/Ruston/RPAR

2025 Ruston Adult 18 & Over - Women · 2.5 Ruston (18&O) Women

7 players · average NTRP 2.50 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-05-04vs Clark/2.5/18&O/Ruston/RPARWon 20
W#1 DoublesTaylor Richardson Burt / Michelle Landry vs Elizabeth Clark / Tatum Mitchell6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJoan McMaster / Julie Shirley vs Amanda Sutherland / Tonya McCulloch6-1, 6-1
2025-04-27vs Clark/2.5/18&O/Ruston/RPARSplit 11
W#1 DoublesCassandra Huneycutt / Ashley Allen vs Elizabeth Clark / Tatum Mitchell6-1, 6-0
L#1 SinglesKrystal Bearden vs Kelley Ivey1-6, 0-6
2025-04-13vs Clark/2.5/18&O/Ruston/RPARWon 30
W#1 DoublesJoan McMaster / Ashley Allen vs Laura Hartt / Amanda Sutherland6-0, 6-2
W#1 SinglesKrystal Bearden vs Elizabeth Clark6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesRegina McNeill / Michelle Landry vs Eva Johnston / Anna Garmon6-2, 7-5
2025-03-30vs Clark/2.5/18&O/Ruston/RPARLost 12
L#1 DoublesMichelle Landry / Taylor Richardson Burt vs Amanda Sutherland / Tonya McCulloch6-1, 1-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesJoan McMaster vs Kelley Ivey6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCassandra Huneycutt / Jennifer Garriga vs Tatum Mitchell / Eva Johnston3-6, 4-6
2025-03-23vs Clark/2.5/18&O/Ruston/RPARWon 30
W#1 DoublesJoan McMaster / Cassandra Huneycutt vs Anna Bates / Kelley Ivey6-3, 6-1
W#1 SinglesKrystal Bearden vs Laura Hartt6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJulie Shirley / Jennifer Garriga vs Tonya McCulloch / Elizabeth Clark7-5, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Ruston (18&O) Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.36 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.38
Joan McMaster
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.33
Julie Shirley
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Cassandra Huneycutt
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Jennifer Garriga
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Krystal Bearden
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Regina McNeill
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Taylor Richardson Burt
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Joan McMaster
11W–14L career · 6 lines in 2025
82%18%<1%
2.38
Julie Shirley
4W–11L career · 5 lines in 2025
90%10%<1%
2.33
2.5
Cassandra Huneycutt
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jennifer Garriga
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Krystal Bearden
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Regina McNeill
2W–3L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Taylor Richardson Burt
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.