Teams

CARMEL V RANCH 40AW3.5A

2025 ADULT 40&Over · Women's 3.5

10 players · average NTRP 3.30 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-03-15vs CARMEL VAC 40AW3.5BWon 21
L#1 DoublesTina Lee / Julia Spinetta vs Jacqueline Lautzenhiser / Jennifer Leighton5-7, 6-1, 0-1
W#1 SinglesCyd Love vs Shannon Pufahl6-0, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMaryse Shank / Kyung Kim vs Gleidy Wetzel / Kimberly Nixon6-2, 6-1
2025-02-09vs CARMEL VAC 40AW3.5BWon 21
L#1 SinglesCyd Love vs Shannon Conner3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesLisa Talley Dean / Kimberly le Towt vs Madlene Condon / Patricia Dealey6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesAlexis Delehanty / Elizabeth Kirkpatrick vs Gleidy Wetzel / Kimberly Nixon6-3, 1-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women's 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.01 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Cyd Love
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.24
Christina Shamah
published 3.5
3.17
Amy Peinado
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.96
Becky McKeen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Alexis Delehanty
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.69
Kyung Kim
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Julia Spinetta
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Lisa Talley Dean
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Murial Lin
published
Tina Lee
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tina Lee + Julia Spinetta224 matchesnot enough data
Christina Shamah + Kyung Kim044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Cyd Love
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Christina Shamah
0W–5L career · type S · no lines in 2025
3%94%2%
3.24
3.5
Amy Peinado
2W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.17
3
Becky McKeen
4W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%63%37%
2.96
3
Alexis Delehanty
1W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Kyung Kim
1W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
99%1%<1%
2.69
Julia Spinetta
6W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Lisa Talley Dean
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Murial Lin
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Tina Lee
2W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.