Teams

AHunt (Charlotte Tennis Matthews)

2026 Combo Doubles 40 & Over League · 40 & Over Combo 6.5 Men - Tues PM

9 players · average NTRP 3.25 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-09-01vs MHolland (JCC)Split 11
L#1 DoublesAndy Hunt / Todd Kasler vs Greg Hobby / Richard Williamson4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesDavid Whiteman / Douglas Skrainka vs Perry Pao / Neill Burris6-1, 6-0
2026-08-25vs KFranks (PPRSC)Won 21
W#1 DoublesAndy Hunt / Christopher Greiner vs Rod Wilkes / Craig Menninger3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDavid Whiteman / Chris Lucas vs Tom Stapleton / Donald Ford II6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesRick Nicholson / Douglas Skrainka vs Tim Hausmann / Chuck Norton3-6, 2-6
2026-08-18vs PTighe (Blakeney)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesChristopher Greiner / Douglas Skrainka vs Fernando Gevaerd / Manojkumar Panachikal Madhavan5-7, 6-1, 0-1
W#2 DoublesDavid Whiteman / Andy Hunt vs Timothy Hodge / PATRICK TIGHE6-0, 7-6
L#3 DoublesPaul Gress / David Richards vs Douglas Harrison / Leonard Evansek2-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Combo 6.5 Men - Tues PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.13 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.55
David Whiteman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.47
Todd Kasler
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.33
Christopher Greiner
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.98
Douglas Skrainka
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.97
Andy Hunt
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.83
Chris Lucas
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.80
Rick Nicholson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Ozzie Alvarado
published
Paul Gress
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Andy Hunt + David Whiteman4157% games+0.6% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
David Whiteman
27W–16L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%36%64%
3.55
3.5
Todd Kasler
58W–37L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%58%42%
3.47
3.5
Christopher Greiner
10W–4L career · type M · 2 lines in 2026
1%90%10%
3.33
3
Douglas Skrainka
4W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%57%43%
2.98
3
Andy Hunt
10W–21L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%58%42%
2.97
3
Chris Lucas
3W–10L career · 1 line in 2026
1%90%9%
2.83
Rick Nicholson
0W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
94%6%<1%
2.80
Ozzie Alvarado
1W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Paul Gress
5W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.