Teams

Ardea Shotchasers

2026 Pinellas Combo 50 & Over Fall · 6.5 W Saturday

14 players · average NTRP 3.25 / REGION_3

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 6.5 W Saturday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.87 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.17
Amy Burns
published 3.5
3.06
Martha Cornatzer
published 3.5
3.04
Ana Jara
published 3.5
3.00
Stacey Castellini
published 3.5
2.87
Noela Fries
published
2.85
Robyn Houston
published
2.74
Debra Burwell
published 3
2.73
Lee Cucchi
published 3
2.67
2.57
Kimberly Ankney
published 3
Gail Stallwood
published
Leslie McMahon
published
Liwen Tao
published
Mary Turnbull
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Robyn Houston + Lee Cucchi7556% games−1.4% vs expected
Ana Jara + Kimberly Ankney4545% games−9.7% vs expected
Stacey Castellini + Martha Cornatzer51941% gamesnot enough data
Ana Jara + Martha Cornatzer3546% gamesnot enough data
Lee Cucchi + Kimberly Ankney2644% gamesnot enough data
Lee Cucchi + Martha Cornatzer4355% gamesnot enough data
Kimberly Ankney + Martha Cornatzer4256% gamesnot enough data
Stacey Castellini + Kimberly Ankney123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Amy Burns
5W–7L career · no lines in 2026
11%88%1%
3.17
3.5
Martha Cornatzer
117W–130L career · no lines in 2026
34%66%<1%
3.06
3.5
Ana Jara
47W–71L career · no lines in 2026
40%60%<1%
3.04
3.5
Stacey Castellini
23W–59L career · no lines in 2026
49%51%<1%
3.00
Noela Fries
2W–9L career · no lines in 2026
83%17%<1%
2.87
Robyn Houston
18W–13L career · no lines in 2026
1%86%13%
2.85
3
Debra Burwell
6W–14L career · no lines in 2026
5%92%3%
2.74
3
Lee Cucchi
53W–41L career · no lines in 2026
5%92%3%
2.73
3
Christine Hueholt
5W–7L career · no lines in 2026
11%88%1%
2.67
3
Kimberly Ankney
76W–159L career · no lines in 2026
31%69%<1%
2.57
Gail Stallwood
4W–6L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Leslie McMahon
0W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Liwen Tao
0W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Mary Turnbull
2W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.