Teams

LGignac (Carmel)

2024 Combo Doubles 18 & Over League · 18 & Over 8.5 Women

14 players · average NTRP 4.07 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
W#1 DoublesAllyson McKay / Suzannah Hicks vs Lisa Anderson / Ashley Barton6-4, 6-3
2024-09-23vs FOno/TGreen (Chestnut Square)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesLindy Gignac / Suzannah Hicks vs Krista Reardon / Liz Misenheimer4-6, 0-6
2024-09-09vs AStein (Ballantyne CC)Won 10
W#1 DoublesSuzannah Hicks / Dana Fox vs Kandi Jackson / Wendy Lutgring2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2024-09-02vs FOno/TGreen (Chestnut Square)Won 10
W#1 DoublesAllyson McKay / Suzannah Hicks vs Amy Guear / Nancy Miller6-1, 6-4
L#1 DoublesLindy Gignac / Suzannah Hicks vs Laura Williams / Ashley Barton2-6, 2-6
2024-08-19vs AStein (Ballantyne CC)Split 11
L#1 DoublesAmy Elaasar / Lindy Gignac vs Monica Sferro / Kelley Schoeneck2-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesAmy Erwin / Suzannah Hicks vs Jacqueline Cugliari / Briana Letica7-5, 6-2
L#1 DoublesWhitney Smith / Lindy Gignac vs Rosalyn Kartes / Julie Grahl2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over 8.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.77 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.41
Allyson McKay
published 4.5
3.95
Rosie Rogers
published
3.86
Megan Gilson
published
3.85
Dana Fox
published 4
3.85
Liz Rabidou
published
3.84
Maria Mascia
published
3.77
Suzannah Hicks
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.75
Whitney Smith
published
3.68
Amy Erwin
published 4
3.62
Amie Rucker
published 4
3.58
Amy Elaasar
published 4
3.52
Lindy Gignac
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.38
Wendy Solomon
published
Dorian Dipangrazio
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lindy Gignac + Suzannah Hicks61239% games−8.9% vs expected
Rosie Rogers + Lindy Gignac033 matchesnot enough data
Wendy Solomon + Lindy Gignac123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Allyson McKay
9W–1L career · no lines in 2024
<1%74%26%
4.41
Rosie Rogers
4W–9L career · no lines in 2024
63%37%<1%
3.95
Megan Gilson
2W–6L career · no lines in 2024
84%16%<1%
3.86
4
Dana Fox
7W–6L career · no lines in 2024
1%85%15%
3.85
Liz Rabidou
6W–6L career · no lines in 2024
1%86%14%
3.85
Maria Mascia
2W–9L career · no lines in 2024
88%12%<1%
3.84
4
Suzannah Hicks
98W–73L career · 10 lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.77
Whitney Smith
10W–8L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%4%
3.75
4
Amy Erwin
2W–6L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.68
4
Amie Rucker
0W–3L career · no lines in 2024
19%80%<1%
3.62
4
Amy Elaasar
7W–1L career · no lines in 2024
30%70%<1%
3.58
4
Lindy Gignac
115W–88L career · 8 lines in 2024
43%56%<1%
3.52
Wendy Solomon
7W–10L career · no lines in 2024
<1%79%20%
3.38
Dorian Dipangrazio
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.