Teams

LCranford (Sardis)

2022 Adult 55 & Over League · 55 & Over Adult 3.5 Women

6 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-04-29vs JNomina/Sanderson (OPRC)Lost 01
L#3 DoublesLinda Cranford / Holly Foley vs Janice Abluton / Tina Hough2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2022-04-01vs JGieker (Life Time)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesHolly Foley / Mia Delmontagne vs Ofelia Claxton / Tiffani Wagner1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesCathie DeCramer / Holly Foley vs Pam Richardson / Patricia Beatty4-6, 6-7
2022-03-04vs KBowman (Weddington)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesSandra Holmes / Holly Foley vs Karen Bowman / Anne Mauldin3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2022-02-25vs KFoster (Weddington)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesCathy Culbertson / Holly Foley vs Sally Dickson / Lynda Snider1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 55 & Over Adult 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.76 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.02
Mia Delmontagne
published
2.94
Holly Foley
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.77
Cathie DeCramer
published 3
2.75
Laura Flowe
published
2.70
Laura Weisner
published
2.38
Linda Cranford
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cathie DeCramer + Laura Weisner213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mia Delmontagne
7W–11L career · no lines in 2022
45%55%<1%
3.02
3
Holly Foley
77W–80L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%69%31%
2.94
3
Cathie DeCramer
3W–6L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
2.77
Laura Flowe
3W–8L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
2.75
Laura Weisner
5W–7L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
2.70
Linda Cranford
2W–14L career · no lines in 2022
82%18%<1%
2.38

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.