Teams

Moorehead

2025 Adult 40 & Over-EC · Women 3.5

11 players · average NTRP 3.00 / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-05-22vs SheltonLost 12
W#1 DoublesKathy Kelly / Maggie Hamilton vs Ashli Dunn / Shannon Stafford6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesLynn Moorehead / Linda Acy vs Martha Galloway / Patti Stanley3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesAdriane Davis / Cheryl Andrews vs Renee Phillips / Sara Brown7-6, 3-6, 0-1
2025-05-20vs Campassi 40+ Columbus-MTCLost 12
L#1 DoublesLynn Moorehead / Claire Spradling vs Johnnie Hailey / Tracy Provenza3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMelanie Crain / Cheryl Andrews vs Leslie Webber / Kathryn Kenne2-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesKathy Kelly / Maggie Hamilton vs Debbie Monroe / Karen Turner6-0, 6-1
2025-05-19vs Campassi 40+ Columbus-MTCLost 04
L#1 DoublesMelanie Crain / Cheryl Andrews vs Bette Rhea / Catherine van Asselt1-6, 5-7
L#1 SinglesPatricia Faver vs Debbie Monroe4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesLynn Moorehead / Laura Hodges vs Leslie Webber / Jennifer Falkner2-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesKevin Voller / Christy Dickerson vs Helen Campassi / Kathryn Kenne5-7, 4-6
2025-05-14vs Campassi 40+ Columbus-MTCLost 04
L#1 DoublesAdriane Davis / Linda Acy vs Bette Rhea / Catherine van Asselt1-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesPatricia Faver vs Kathryn Kenne1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesLynn Moorehead / Kevin Voller vs Debbie Monroe / Tracy Provenza0-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesLaura Hodges / Cheryl Andrews vs Leslie Webber / Missy Brown2-6, 3-6
2025-04-29vs SheltonLost 04
L#1 DoublesLaura Hodges / Cheryl Andrews vs Sara Brown / Teri Martin2-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesPatricia Faver vs Emily Anne Callaway1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesAdriane Davis / Christy Dickerson vs Cyndi Sullivan / Shannon Stafford2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesKevin Voller / Linda Acy vs Heather Logan / Patti Stanley0-6, 0-6
2025-04-14vs Campassi 40+ Columbus-MTCWon 31
L#1 DoublesLynn Moorehead / Robbin Jones vs Maria Bearden / Leslie Webber3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#1 SinglesPatricia Faver vs Kathryn Kenne6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesKathy Kelly / Maggie Hamilton vs Bette Rhea / Renee Gibbons6-3, 6-0
W#3 DoublesLinda Acy / Cheryl Andrews vs Helen Campassi / Karen Turner7-5, 7-5
2025-04-13vs SheltonLost 03
L#1 DoublesKathy Kelly / Maggie Hamilton vs Shannon Stafford / Martha Galloway2-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesRobbin Jones vs Sarah Huerkamp0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesLaura Hodges / Christy Dickerson vs Sara Brown / Teri Martin6-2, 1-6, 1-0
2025-03-25vs SheltonLost 04
L#1 DoublesKathy Kelly / Maggie Hamilton vs Martha Galloway / Teri Martin6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesPatricia Faver vs Sarah Huerkamp1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesClaire Spradling / Laura Hodges vs Renee Phillips / Emily Anne Callaway7-6, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesChristy Dickerson / Adriane Davis vs Emily Waters / Ashli Dunn1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · Women 3.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Shelton62221025239
2Campassi 40+ Columbus-MTC53201228265
3Moorehead1762652335

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.64 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.78
Linda Acy
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Adriane Davis
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Cheryl Andrews
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
Christy Dickerson
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3
Claire Spradling
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.58
Maggie Hamilton
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
2.55
Patricia Faver
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published
Kevin Voller
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Lynn Moorehead
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Melanie Crain
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Robbin Jones
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cheryl Andrews + Linda Acy123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Linda Acy
4W–8L career · 6 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
2.78
3
Adriane Davis
0W–6L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Cheryl Andrews
1W–9L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Christy Dickerson
3W–9L career · 7 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Claire Spradling
3W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Maggie Hamilton
23W–23L career · 5 lines in 2025
28%72%<1%
2.58
Patricia Faver
4W–14L career · 10 lines in 2025
37%63%<1%
2.55
Kevin Voller
1W–11L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data
Lynn Moorehead
1W–12L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Melanie Crain
0W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Robbin Jones
0W–8L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.