Teams

IA-REG-Boyer

18 & Over .5's Aug. 18-20 · 4.5 Men

10 players · average NTRP 4.50 / OKLAHOMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings7 teams · 4.5 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1NE-REG-Betts000000
2HOA-REG-Mekles000000
3IA-REG-Boyer000000
4KS-REG-Whitmer/Jones/18&Over4.5M000000
5OK-Reg-Ramsey/Tims000000
6STL-REG-Hamilton/18&Over4.5M000000
7OKWC-REG-Smith000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.24 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.35
Michael Boyer
published
4.30
Justin Despotovich
published
4.25
Anthony Forcucci
published 4.5
Chad Moklestad
published 4.5
Chris Yuska
published 4.5
4.18
Jordan Brackey
published
4.12
John Biegert
published
Mark Blume
published
Tim Paulson
published
Willis Hong
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Justin Despotovich + Michael Boyer11164% games+6.3% vs expected
Justin Despotovich + Chad Moklestad5075% gamesnot enough data
Tim Paulson + Michael Boyer404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Michael Boyer
118W–26L career · no lines in 2023
<1%87%13%
4.35
Justin Despotovich
69W–17L career · no lines in 2023
1%93%6%
4.30
4.5
Anthony Forcucci
13W–2L career · no lines in 2023
3%95%3%
4.25
4.5
Chad Moklestad
12W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4.5
Chris Yuska
12W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Jordan Brackey
14W–18L career · no lines in 2023
8%91%1%
4.18
John Biegert
11W–10L career · no lines in 2023
18%82%<1%
4.12
Mark Blume
19W–11L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Tim Paulson
24W–6L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Willis Hong
13W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.