Teams

McMullen Rebels

2023 Pinellas Combo 50 & Over Fall · 7.5 W Saturday

12 players · average NTRP 3.80 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2023-11-11vs ELW SweetshotsWon 10
W#2 DoublesLaura Hungiville / Amy Burns vs Wendy Unger / Noela Fries2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2023-10-14vs Innisbrook SuyaoLost 01
L#1 DoublesIrene Nasworthy / Amy Burns vs Patty Halstead / Leslie Herrion4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2023-09-30vs SPTC Alley GatorsWon 10
W#1 DoublesLaura Hungiville / Judy Carlin vs Caroline Stupple / Virginie Khare6-3, 6-2
2023-09-23vs McMullen Ebony & IvoryLost 01
L#1 DoublesLaura Hungiville / Judy Carlin vs Dina Glover / Colleen Singer5-7, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 W Saturday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.58 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.90
Kirsten Willis
published
3.78
Irene Nasworthy
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.75
Monica Sanchez
published
3.71
Cheryl Pawlowski
published 4
3.65
Deirdre West
published 4
3.60
Mary Jacobs
published
3.30
Laura Hungiville
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.27
Kelly Moore
published
3.22
Amy Burns
published 3.5
Rachel McCaskill
published
SHERI ELLIS
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Deirdre West + Irene Nasworthy3844% games−13.2% vs expected
Irene Nasworthy + Monica Sanchez224 matchesnot enough data
Deirdre West + Monica Sanchez123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kirsten Willis
10W–16L career · no lines in 2023
<1%78%21%
3.90
4
Irene Nasworthy
186W–103L career · 1 line in 2023
2%94%5%
3.78
Monica Sanchez
24W–24L career · no lines in 2023
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Cheryl Pawlowski
15W–15L career · no lines in 2023
5%94%1%
3.71
4
Deirdre West
14W–29L career · no lines in 2023
13%87%<1%
3.65
Mary Jacobs
0W–3L career · no lines in 2023
21%79%<1%
3.60
3.5
Laura Hungiville
67W–119L career · 3 lines in 2023
1%93%6%
3.30
Kelly Moore
21W–8L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Amy Burns
4W–7L career · no lines in 2023
5%94%2%
3.22
Kathleen Annichiarico
4W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Rachel McCaskill
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
SHERI ELLIS
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.