Teams

SSteffey (Southampton)

2023 Combo Doubles 18 & Over League · 18 & Over 7.5 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.67 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-09-28vs MChaney (Raintree)Split 11
L#1 DoublesNancy Pridnia / Jenni Hovis vs Emily Patterson / Megan Hua Shaul3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesHolli High / Teri Iezzi vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-09-19Won 10
W#1 DoublesRobin Medlock / Ariel Burgoon vs Sarah Schweppe / Laura Case6-4, 6-1
2023-08-31vs EJohnston/MMerchant (Queens)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesRobin Medlock / Holli High vs Elizabeth Johnston / Lynn Selland2-6, 4-6
2023-08-24vs WJourdan (PPRSC)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesTeri Iezzi / Kara Moore vs Wendy Jourdan / Marisa Haehnlein4-6, 1-6
2023-08-17vs KHart/RDrees (Blakeney)Won 10
W#1 DoublesKerrie Melker / Nancy Pridnia vs Adrianna Graves / Sanami Nakai6-2, 1-6, 1-0
2023-08-10vs KPerry (Queens)Won 10
W#1 DoublesRobin Medlock / Holli High vs Karissa Chaplinsky / Katie van Valkinburgh6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over 7.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.36 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
Robin Medlock
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.72
Nancy Pridnia
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.33
Janice Daniel
published
Anne-Bee van Meter
published 3.5
3.22
Holli High
published 3.5
3.17
Shelly Steffey
published
3.15
Cheri Johnson
published 3.5
3.12
Teri Iezzi
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Ariel Burgoon
published
Jenni Hovis
published
Rebecca O'Toole
published
Whitney Head
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nancy Pridnia + Robin Medlock712458% games+3.0% vs expected
Teri Iezzi + Cheri Johnson4159% gamesnot enough data
Janice Daniel + Teri Iezzi303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Robin Medlock
125W–74L career · 3 lines in 2023
1%92%7%
3.81
4
Nancy Pridnia
126W–62L career · 2 lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.72
Janice Daniel
41W–29L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%10%
3.33
3.5
Anne-Bee van Meter
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Holli High
13W–9L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.22
Shelly Steffey
54W–40L career · no lines in 2023
9%90%1%
3.17
3.5
Cheri Johnson
12W–17L career · no lines in 2023
12%87%<1%
3.15
3.5
Teri Iezzi
110W–84L career · 2 lines in 2023
18%81%<1%
3.12
Ariel Burgoon
7W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Jenni Hovis
4W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Rebecca O'Toole
1W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Whitney Head
1W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.