Teams

1-KTravis-WW

2023 Eno River Adult 40 & Over · 40 & Over Adult 3.0 Women-Day

10 players · average NTRP 3.20 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-05-01vs 2-LGilchrist CHCC 40 3.0Won 10
W#1 DoublesKrissy Anderson / Tracey Maurer vs Marci Hansen / Christy Lewis6-1, 6-0
2023-04-12vs 3-LWollman-CHCCWon 20
W#1 DoublesKatie Elder / Tracey Maurer vs Lee Wollman / Judi Seagroves6-0, 6-2
W#1 SinglesLisa Hsu vs Jane Holroyd4-6, 6-1, 1-0
2023-04-05vs 5-Everett-Craver-HVCCWon 10
W#1 DoublesLisa Hsu / Tracey Maurer vs Kate Barron / Elizabeth Everett6-1, 6-4
2023-04-03vs 4-LKieffer-FARMLost 02
L#1 DoublesKrissy Anderson / Lisa Hsu vs Caryl Schwartzbach / Ann Weissler1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMercer Griffin / Blake Ellis vs Anne Heymann / LAURIE KIEFFER7-5, 3-6, 0-1
2023-03-20vs 2-LGilchrist CHCC 40 3.0Won 10
W#2 DoublesTracey Maurer / Lisa Hsu vs Marci Hansen / Leslye Rood6-0, 6-0
2023-03-06Won 10
W#1 SinglesTracey Maurer vs Fiona Lundblad6-2, 6-1
2023-03-01vs 3-LWollman-CHCCWon 20
W#1 DoublesKrissy Anderson / Tracey Maurer vs Carrie Williamson / Leslie Brown7-5, 6-4
W#3 DoublesBeth Angle / Mercer Griffin vs Judi Seagroves / Denise Kennihan6-4, 6-0
2023-02-27vs 4-LKieffer-FARMLost 01
L#1 DoublesKelly Travis / Lisa Hsu vs Kelly Johnson / Rebecca Tomasini2-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Adult 3.0 Women-Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.09 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.59
Katie Elder
published
3.42
Joyce Robinson
published
3.39
Tracey Maurer
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 17% · published 3.5
3.31
Krissy Anderson
published
3.20
Kelly Travis
published
3.18
Lisa Hsu
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
2.76
Mercer Griffin
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.71
Beth Angle
published 3
2.66
Emma Schaufele
published
2.65
Blake Ellis
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Joyce Robinson + Tracey Maurer6365% games+7.3% vs expected
Blake Ellis + Mercer Griffin3542% games−3.9% vs expected
Lisa Hsu + Tracey Maurer5451% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Katie Elder
36W–14L career · no lines in 2023
<1%26%74%
3.59
Joyce Robinson
16W–13L career · no lines in 2023
<1%72%28%
3.42
3.5
Tracey Maurer
85W–62L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%79%21%
3.39
Krissy Anderson
10W–8L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%9%
3.31
Kelly Travis
20W–25L career · no lines in 2023
8%91%2%
3.20
3.5
Lisa Hsu
91W–91L career · 5 lines in 2023
10%89%1%
3.18
3
Mercer Griffin
29W–42L career · 2 lines in 2023
3%92%4%
2.76
3
Beth Angle
3W–2L career · no lines in 2023
7%91%2%
2.71
Emma Schaufele
2W–3L career · no lines in 2023
13%87%1%
2.66
3
Blake Ellis
4W–15L career · no lines in 2023
15%85%1%
2.65

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.