Teams

WI Tri Delta M Sngls MALT Sager

2022 WI Other · WI Tri Level Delta Summer Singles Men

3 players · average NTRP / WISCONSIN

View scouting list →
Flight standings6 teams · WI Tri Level Delta Summer Singles Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1WI Tri Delta M Sngls MALT Nicholas9121922222
2WI Tri Delta M Sngls MALT Isensee73191125211
3WI Tri Delta M Sngls MALT Sager73161434260
4WI Tri Delta M Sngls MALT O'Connor46151534254
5WI Tri Delta M Sngls MALT Boregowda2882247306
6WI Tri Delta M Sngls MALT Cohen19111941288

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.54
Jeremy Sager
usually #2 Singles 94%, also #3 Singles 6% · published
3.18
Ricky Thorson
usually #1 Singles 71%, also #3 Singles 25% · published
3.15
Timur Mavlyutov
usually #3 Singles 63%, also #1 Singles 26% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jeremy Sager
59W–50L career · 18 lines in 2022
38%62%<1%
3.54
Ricky Thorson
20W–22L career · 24 lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.18
Timur Mavlyutov
111W–140L career · 27 lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
3.15

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.