Teams

A18 2.5W KI Ziegler

2023 NEOTA Adult 18 & Over · NEOTA A18&O 2.5 Women Summer

18 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTHEASTERN OHIO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-07-17vs A18 2.5W WE StrawserLost 12
L#1 DoublesSusan Tobin / Jennifer Klemenc vs Michelle Heyka / Susan Wiley5-7, 0-6
W#1 SinglesMegan Monticello vs Carla Stachiw6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesLita Laven / Heta Chatterjee vs Laura Deyo / Leigh Strawser2-6, 1-6
2023-07-10vs A18 2.5W CRC2 KalasLost 12
L#1 DoublesNikki Trivisonno / Paige Kettani vs Natasha Kalas / Lela Henry1-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesMegan Monticello vs Maya Tokmazeysky3-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMoya Dacey / Julie Cox vs Cynthia Burke / Mary Cooper4-6, 4-6
2023-06-26vs A18 2.5W CV1 FanosLost 03
L#1 DoublesNikki Trivisonno / Carrie Vaccariello vs Lisa Beus / Anne Halper3-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesMoya Dacey vs Jill Fanos2-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesJane Thornburgh / Jen Hupp vs Beverly Goldie / Betsey Poe5-7, 4-6
2023-06-19vs A18 2.5W MV2 NormanLost 12
L#1 DoublesHope Ziegler / Shelly Rieple vs Felicia Norman / Catherine Lentini3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#1 SinglesLynda Brandal vs Haifeng Wang6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesCasee Coleman / Lita Laven vs Kathleen Craig / Gretchen Liggens6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2023-06-05vs A18 2.5W WE StrawserLost 03
L#1 DoublesNikki Trivisonno / Lita Laven vs Rachel Uram / Mindy Qua3-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesPaige Kettani vs Leigh Strawser1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesMoya Dacey / Megan Kozlowski vs Carla Stachiw / Erin Riddle0-6, 0-6
2023-05-22vs A18 2.5W CRC2 KalasLost 12
L#1 DoublesJennifer Klemenc / Heta Chatterjee vs Kimberly Corbets / Shelly Saltzman0-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesMegan Monticello vs Meredith Bond1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSusan Tobin / Megan Kozlowski vs Mary Cooper / Cynthia Burke0-6, 0-6
2023-05-15vs A18 2.5W CV1 FanosLost 12
L#1 DoublesAshley Vodila / Jenifer Halapy vs Beverly Chambers / Lisa Beus0-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesHope Ziegler vs Robin Kleinman6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesJen Hupp / Julie Cox vs Beverly Goldie / Betsey Poe0-6, 1-6
2023-05-08vs A18 2.5W MV2 NormanWon 30
W#1 DoublesShelly Rieple / Lynda Brandal vs Kathleen Craig / Felicia Norman6-3, 6-1
W#1 SinglesJane Thornburgh vs Catherine Lentini6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesCasee Coleman / Carrie Vaccariello vs Sarah Richlak / Mary Beth Rezek6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings33 teams · NEOTA A18&O 2.5 Women Summer
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1A18 2.5W PM2 Tople10025514196
2A18 2.5W WR1 Fete9124617193
3A18 2.5W NC2 Blake9121924235
4A18 2.5W MV3 Wortmann802048103
5A18 2.5W CRC2 Kalas8020411122
6A18 2.5W PW1 Hensley712049117
7A18 2.5W CC Wotawa73201023216
8A18 2.5W SH2 Ransdell73171328236
9A18 2.5W CV2 Fromson6215920193
10A18 2.5W PCC Innes64191126243
11A18 2.5W SP2 Pulk64191126232
12A18 2.5W MM Debenahm53141020165
13A18 2.5W AO1 Cavalier5315922179
14A18 2.5W CV1 Fanos53131123195
15A18 2.5W TP1 Laux55151533260
16A18 2.5W LT3 Mitchell55161434268
17A18 2.5W WE Strawser44121226189
18A18 2.5W LT1 Donze46141633245
19A18 2.5W TP2 Leffler46141634256
20A18 2.5W GR Foster46141638303
21A18 2.5W WR2 Shedloski35111331225
22A18 2.5W CRC1 Adler35101431214
23A18 2.5W PW2 McKinney3581632217
24A18 2.5W SH1 Dilling37111943305
25A18 2.5W BR Vrabel3792143296
26A18 2.5W NC1 Adams3792145308
27A18 2.5W MV2 Norman2671736250
28A18 2.5W SP1 Goumas28111943309
29A18 2.5W LT2 Gillis2852552323
30A18 2.5W KI Ziegler1781634234
31A18 2.5W PM1 Burke1962451328
32A18 2.5W AO2 Drury0832142271
33A18 2.5W MV1 Carracher0842044284

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.83 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.07
Lynda Brandal
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
3.00
Hope Ziegler
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.84
Shelly Rieple
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.79
Carrie Vaccariello
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.74
Nikki Trivisonno
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.52
Lita Laven
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Ashley Vodila
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Casee Coleman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Heta Chatterjee
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Jane Thornburgh
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Jen Hupp
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Jenifer Halapy
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Jennifer Klemenc
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Megan Kozlowski
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Megan Monticello
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Moya Dacey
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Paige Kettani
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Susan Tobin
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Hope Ziegler + Lynda Brandal7072% games+20.2% vs expected
Hope Ziegler + Nikki Trivisonno10267% games+16.4% vs expected
Lynda Brandal + Nikki Trivisonno6650% games+4.4% vs expected
Hope Ziegler + Shelly Rieple224 matchesnot enough data
Lynda Brandal + Shelly Rieple314 matchesnot enough data
Nikki Trivisonno + Shelly Rieple134 matchesnot enough data
Megan Monticello + Lynda Brandal213 matchesnot enough data
Megan Monticello + Carrie Vaccariello303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lynda Brandal
40W–17L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%30%70%
3.07
3
Hope Ziegler
26W–8L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%50%50%
3.00
Shelly Rieple
16W–10L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%88%11%
2.84
3
Carrie Vaccariello
16W–5L career · 2 lines in 2023
1%94%5%
2.79
Nikki Trivisonno
27W–24L career · 3 lines in 2023
3%95%2%
2.74
Lita Laven
17W–22L career · 3 lines in 2023
44%56%<1%
2.52
Ashley Vodila
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Casee Coleman
1W–4L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Heta Chatterjee
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Jane Thornburgh
1W–6L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Jen Hupp
6W–8L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Jenifer Halapy
0W–4L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Jennifer Klemenc
0W–4L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Megan Kozlowski
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Megan Monticello
11W–8L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Moya Dacey
1W–9L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Paige Kettani
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Susan Tobin
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.