Teams

Maclean - SHL

2025 Escambia Combo 18 & Over · 5.5 Combo 18 & Over - Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.00 / REGION_1

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-12-11vs Ratliff - RS HardWon 21
L#1 DoublesAna Yordanova / Christine Re vs Courtney Fell / Katie Fruitticher4-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesChristina Amjad / Jessica Isakson vs Elizabeth Dosh / Monika Greene7-5, 6-2
W#3 DoublesKelli Filardi / Maryellen MacLean vs Skye Matthews / Sara Ratliff6-3, 6-2
2025-11-20vs Kirk - SHLWon 21
W#1 DoublesAna Yordanova / Jessica Isakson vs Teresa Kirk / Kim Mcwherter6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMelissa Gibson / Maryellen MacLean vs Mary Brann / Stephanie Hepler6-7, 6-7
W#3 DoublesKelli Filardi / Mary Pene vs Sarah Marsden / Mykel Robinson6-1, 6-3
2025-11-13vs Escambia/SparksLost 02
L#1 DoublesCara Tenpenny / Ana Yordanova vs Amatul Bean / Danielle Turner4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesHunter Strobel / Jessica Isakson vs Reghan Robinson / Jill Sparks4-6, 3-6
2025-11-06vs Couch -PCCLost 12
L#1 DoublesMelissa Gibson / Maryellen MacLean vs Sandra Ling / PATRICIA Ghiglino4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesChristine Re / Ana Yordanova vs Antonia Starzmann / Marissa Couch2-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesJessica Isakson / Mary Pene vs Victoria Grise / Madyson Stacker6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2025-10-30vs Rick - RS HardLost 12
W#1 DoublesAna Yordanova / Christine Re vs Heather Harmon / Rhonda Springer6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMelissa Gibson / Samantha Lee Kuhn vs Abigail Rick / Chelsey Swann6-0, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesChristina Amjad / Jessica Isakson vs Natalie Nguyen / Jessic Melton3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 5.5 Combo 18 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.69 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.04
Cara Tenpenny
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.99
Haley Papajohn
published 3
2.91
Hunter Strobel
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.80
Christine Re
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.77
Kelli Filardi
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.62
Christina Amjad
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.61
Ana Yordanova
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.55
Maryellen MacLean
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.55
Mary Pene
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.40
Jessica Isakson
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
2.37
Melissa Gibson
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Samantha Lee Kuhn
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mary Pene + Jessica Isakson224 matchesnot enough data
Mary Pene + Kelli Filardi123 matchesnot enough data
Haley Papajohn + Cara Tenpenny213 matchesnot enough data
Ana Yordanova + Christine Re123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Cara Tenpenny
6W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%39%61%
3.04
3
Haley Papajohn
5W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%54%46%
2.99
3
Hunter Strobel
4W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%75%25%
2.91
3
Christine Re
39W–25L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%93%6%
2.80
Kelli Filardi
18W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Christina Amjad
4W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
2.62
3
Ana Yordanova
3W–7L career · 5 lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
2.61
Maryellen MacLean
3W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
34%66%<1%
2.55
Mary Pene
7W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
35%65%<1%
2.55
Jessica Isakson
10W–16L career · 5 lines in 2025
78%22%<1%
2.40
Melissa Gibson
5W–12L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%84%16%
2.37
Samantha Lee Kuhn
2W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.