Teams

WI Adult 18&O 3.0W MALT Palreddy

2026 WI Adult 18 & Over · WI Adult 18 & Over 3.0 Women

6 players · average NTRP 3.00 / WISCONSIN

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-06-25vs WI Adult 18&O 3.0W MALT AndersonLost 13
W#1 DoublesKatie Mills / Ashley Russell vs Donna Neuber / Patricia Kehoe6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKristy Kelly / Laura Eastman vs Jennifer Hartwig / Susan Kalin1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 SinglesSOUMYA PALREDDY vs Jess Anderson2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMelissa Pollari / Megan Cancila vs Amy Fields / Mei Hu0-6, 4-6
2026-06-18vs WI Adult 18&O 3.0W MALT KobelskiLost 12
L#2 DoublesClaire Schaefer / Katrina Kelly vs Alyssa Resop / Karen Kobelski3-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesSOUMYA PALREDDY vs Emily Stephenson6-1, 6-3
L#3 DoublesKristy Kelly / Claire Hotz vs Laura Parker / Melissa Siewert2-6, 1-6
2026-06-04vs WI Adult 18&O 3.0W MALT MatsonWon 31
W#1 SinglesKatie Mills vs Rachel Yeck7-5, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMelissa Pollari / Megan Cancila vs Nicole Desjardins / Paula Bezark-larue6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesSOUMYA PALREDDY vs Ella Tomko6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesClaire Hotz / Kristy Kelly vs Samantha Kershner / Maggie Bach1-6, 2-6
2026-05-14vs WI Adult 18&O 3.0W MALT MadsonLost 04
L#1 DoublesKatie Mills / Ashley Russell vs Jenniffer Madson / Kristin Shadman3-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesMegan Cancila vs Jennifer Salin0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesSOUMYA PALREDDY / Kristy Kelly vs Heather Buettner / Elizabeth Goetz0-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesKatrina Kelly vs Louisa Enz0-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WI Adult 18 & Over 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.58 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.79
Katie Mills
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.74
SOUMYA PALREDDY
usually #2 Singles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.53
Claire Schaefer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.52
Katrina Kelly
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.51
Megan Cancila
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.40
Kristy Kelly
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kristy Kelly + Megan Cancila1535% gamesnot enough data
SOUMYA PALREDDY + Katie Mills044 matchesnot enough data
Katrina Kelly + Claire Schaefer044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Katie Mills
17W–17L career · 6 lines in 2026
1%93%5%
2.79
SOUMYA PALREDDY
5W–23L career · 4 lines in 2026
3%94%2%
2.74
3
Claire Schaefer
0W–8L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
41%59%<1%
2.53
Katrina Kelly
2W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
44%55%<1%
2.52
Megan Cancila
3W–13L career · 3 lines in 2026
46%54%<1%
2.51
Kristy Kelly
1W–16L career · 4 lines in 2026
77%23%<1%
2.40

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.