Teams

Slidell 7.5M/Sli/HJC

2024 Slidell Southern Combo 55 & Over - Men · 7.5 Slidell (55&O) Men

7 players · average NTRP 4.00 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-10-08vs Calamari/55's/7.5M/Sli/HJCSplit 11
W#1 DoublesCultus Pearson / Stan Elmore vs Paul Clinkscales / Jeffrey Bacino6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKevin Leblanc / Joe Mitchell vs Donald Geier / Scott White0-6, 1-6
2024-10-02vs Calamari/55's/7.5M/Sli/HJCLost 02
L#1 DoublesKevin Leblanc / Stan Elmore vs Donald Geier / Scott White1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesCultus Pearson / Richard Armond vs Phong La / Jack Pecot2-6, 1-6
2024-09-25vs Calamari/55's/7.5M/Sli/HJCLost 02
L#1 DoublesCultus Pearson / Stan Elmore vs Paul Clinkscales / Tom Miller2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesFreddie Savoie / Joe Mitchell vs Donald Geier / Jack Pecot3-6, 2-6
2024-09-18vs Calamari/55's/7.5M/Sli/HJCLost 02
L#1 DoublesFreddie Savoie / Joe Mitchell vs Henry P Calamari / Jeffrey Bacino3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKevin Leblanc / Richard Armond vs Paul Clinkscales / Ronnie Savoy3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Slidell (55&O) Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.19 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.55
Ernest Anderson
published
3.42
Cultus Pearson
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.26
Kevin Leblanc
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.11
Richard Armond
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.93
Stan Elmore
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.89
Joe Mitchell
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Freddie Savoie
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stan Elmore + Richard Armond2351% games−9.8% vs expected
Ernest Anderson + Kevin Leblanc033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Ernest Anderson
13W–29L career · no lines in 2024
35%65%<1%
3.55
4
Cultus Pearson
5W–17L career · 3 lines in 2024
72%28%<1%
3.42
Kevin Leblanc
3W–19L career · 3 lines in 2024
96%4%<1%
3.26
Richard Armond
16W–22L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%21%79%
3.11
Stan Elmore
15W–30L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%68%32%
2.93
Joe Mitchell
37W–57L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%79%21%
2.89
Freddie Savoie
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.