Teams

Team 1 Tamara's Slice Girls

2023 NOVA Adult 40 & Over Winter · NOVA Adult 40 & Over 3.0 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.20 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-03-14vs Team 9 VolleyVixensLost 02
L#1 DoublesQuinn Byrnes / Johanna Maney vs Jann Cassady / Joanna Schindler0-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesAmy Meehan / Hope Wolf vs Debra Ciesar / Lyn Reid4-6, 4-5
2023-03-07vs Team 12 Net JobsWon 10
W#2 DoublesHolly Ford / Johanna Maney vs Amy Heuer / Elizabeth Gay6-4, 6-1
2023-02-26vs Team 8 TrilogyLost 01
L#1 DoublesMaria Browne / Johanna Maney vs Ashley Plexico / Margaret Walls2-6, 1-6
2023-02-21vs Team 16Won 10
W#2 DoublesQuinn Byrnes / Hope Wolf vs Heather Hall / Karen Harriman6-1, 6-3
2023-02-07vs Team 7 Spin DoctorsWon 10
W#2 DoublesJohanna Maney / Hope Wolf vs Fllory Correa / Michelle Schneider6-4, 4-5
2023-02-01Won 20
W#1 SinglesJohanna Maney vs Paula Fitzgerald7-6, 5-2
W#2 DoublesHolly Ford / Hope Wolf vs Halley Coyne / Donna Biderman6-1, 6-1
2023-01-25vs Team 5 Pop & LockWon 20
W#1 DoublesMaria Browne / Johanna Maney vs Kim Cooper / Lenora Rigby6-3, 6-0
W#2 DoublesQuinn Byrnes / Hope Wolf vs Amy Shellard / Enitan Otunla6-4, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Adult 40 & Over 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.89 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.67
Tamara Ashford
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.03
Johanna Maney
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.85
Hope Wolf
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.85
Varsha Chandra
published
2.83
Maria Browne
published
2.77
Ana Rivas Beck
published 3
2.71
Quinn Byrnes
published
2.43
Holly Ford
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Hope Wolf + Johanna Maney8757% games+3.9% vs expected
Ana Rivas Beck + Varsha Chandra314 matchesnot enough data
Varsha Chandra + Johanna Maney303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Tamara Ashford
35W–41L career · 3 lines in 2023
10%89%<1%
3.67
3
Johanna Maney
43W–36L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%40%60%
3.03
3
Hope Wolf
37W–35L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%87%12%
2.85
Varsha Chandra
11W–2L career · no lines in 2023
<1%87%12%
2.85
Maria Browne
5W–1L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%9%
2.83
3
Ana Rivas Beck
6W–3L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
2.77
Quinn Byrnes
6W–3L career · no lines in 2023
5%93%1%
2.71
3
Holly Ford
6W–16L career · no lines in 2023
70%30%<1%
2.43

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.