Teams

RFC:TBD:Morong

2021 ME Tri Level · Women 3.0 1

4 players · average NTRP 3.00 / MAINE

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-11-14vs RFC:TBD:CrosbyWon 10
W#1 DoublesAndrea Otis-Higgins / Ruth Matt vs Elizabeth Boucher / Ruth Crosby4-6, 6-1, 1-0
2021-11-13vs RFC:TBD:RowlandLost 01
L#1 DoublesDawn Morong / Ruth Matt vs Cindy Rowland / Annie Houston3-6, 6-7
2021-10-29vs RFC:TBD:CrosbyLost 01
L#1 DoublesDawn Morong / Ruth Matt vs Jenna Ashburn / Holly Rich5-7, 4-6
2021-10-16vs RFC:TBD:CrosbyWon 10
W#1 DoublesKimberly Nappi / Andrea Otis-Higgins vs Jenna Ashburn / Ruth Crosby4-6, 7-5, 1-0
2021-10-09vs RFC:TBD:RowlandLost 01
L#1 DoublesRuth Matt / Dawn Morong vs Mae Petra-Wong / Cindy Rowland2-6, 7-5, 0-1
2021-10-08vs RFC:TBD:RowlandLost 01
L#1 DoublesKimberly Nappi / Andrea Otis-Higgins vs Cindy Rowland / Krystal Talbot1-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · Women 3.0 1
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1RFC:TBD:Rowland6060139
2RFC:TBD:Morong24241069
3RFC:TBD:Crosby15151069

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.96 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.08
Ruth Matt
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.92
Andrea Otis-Higgins
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.88
Dawn Morong
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Kimberly Nappi
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dawn Morong + Kimberly Nappi1437% games+2.8% vs expected
Dawn Morong + Ruth Matt2446% gamesnot enough data
Dawn Morong + Andrea Otis-Higgins134 matchesnot enough data
Kimberly Nappi + Andrea Otis-Higgins123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Ruth Matt
51W–52L career · 4 lines in 2022
26%74%<1%
3.08
3
Andrea Otis-Higgins
141W–141L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%72%28%
2.92
3
Dawn Morong
51W–79L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%82%18%
2.88
Kimberly Nappi
37W–35L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.