Teams

GEPTA/18&over/4.0M/Rivera/CCC

SouthernNewMexico · 2026 USA SPRING ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE

14 players · average NTRP 3.75 / GEPTA

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2026-03-22vs GEPTA/18&over/4.0M/Montes/EPTC#3Lost 01
L#1 DoublesSalamah Salamah / Alejandro Cervantes vs Alan Couttolenc / Sebastian Mayo3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2026 USA SPRING ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.51 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.94
Josaphat Martinez
published
3.57
Arturo Fierro
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 4
3.55
Bruce Begor
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.49
Alejandro Cervantes
usually #1 Doubles 64%, also #2 Doubles 36% · published 4
3.42
Enrique Darancou
usually #2 Singles 29%, also #2 Doubles 24% · published 3.5
3.38
Enrique Mata
usually #2 Doubles 31%, also #3 Doubles 28% · published 3.5
3.24
Alejandro Orozco
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Joshua Rhoads
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Juan Acevedo
usually #1 Doubles 55%, also #2 Doubles 32% · published
Luis Herran
published
Salamah Salamah
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Sebastian Martinez-Villalba
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Sergio Castaneda
usually #3 Doubles 24%, also #1 Singles 21% · published
Zachary Broome
usually #3 Doubles 78%, also #2 Doubles 11% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Juan Acevedo + Enrique Mata71147% games+10.0% vs expected
Alejandro Orozco + Juan Acevedo2347% gamesnot enough data
Zachary Broome + Juan Acevedo213 matchesnot enough data
Alejandro Orozco + Enrique Mata123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Josaphat Martinez
37W–24L career · no lines in 2026
<1%68%32%
3.94
4
Arturo Fierro
7W–9L career · type S · 8 lines in 2026
30%70%<1%
3.57
4
Bruce Begor
3W–14L career · type A · 7 lines in 2026
34%66%<1%
3.55
4
Alejandro Cervantes
23W–22L career · 11 lines in 2026
53%47%<1%
3.49
3.5
Enrique Darancou
30W–28L career · 16 lines in 2026
<1%72%28%
3.42
3.5
Enrique Mata
58W–110L career · 27 lines in 2026
<1%82%18%
3.38
3.5
Alejandro Orozco
23W–40L career · 9 lines in 2026
3%94%2%
3.24
Joshua Rhoads
24W–27L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Juan Acevedo
52W–84L career · 22 lines in 2026
not enough data
Luis Herran
6W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Salamah Salamah
8W–18L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Sebastian Martinez-Villalba
8W–16L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Sergio Castaneda
62W–85L career · 29 lines in 2026
not enough data
Zachary Broome
17W–37L career · 9 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.