Teams

BSF:Lobsters:Sucoll

2026 NCT Adult 18 & Over Men · 5.0 Adult Men 1

13 players · average NTRP 4.83 / NORTHERN CONNECTICUT

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-06-20vs RFL:5.0:Burda/SalakWon 30
W#1 DoublesJohn Holschlag / Douglas Bracken vs James Burda / Andrew Salak6-1, 6-2
W#1 SinglesJason Sucoll vs Matthew Urbanetti6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesBrook Hazelton / Andrew Martin vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2026-06-06vs RFL:5.0:Burda/SalakWon 21
W#1 DoublesJohn Holschlag / Robert L Barton vs Carlos Salmon / Matthew Urbanetti7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesShrey Choudhary vs Zander Lowe6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesJason Sucoll / Brook Hazelton vs Jeffrey Bowers / Trevor Glasgow2-6, 7-6, 2-6
2026-05-16vs BTC:Bloomfield Bobcats:DatskoWon 30
W#1 DoublesJonathan Lippert / John Holschlag vs Rostyk Datsko / Andy King6-3, 6-2
W#1 SinglesShrey Choudhary vs Mauricio Miranda6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesRobert L Barton / Douglas Bracken vs Kevin Ho / Brandon Hermes6-1, 7-6
2026-05-02vs RFL:5.0:Burda/SalakWon 21
W#1 DoublesJason Sucoll / Eric Lutz vs Jeffrey Bowers / Zander Lowe3-6, 6-4, 7-5
L#1 SinglesAndrew Martin vs Timothy Fayed3-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesDouglas Bracken / Jonathan Lippert vs James Burda / Carlos Salmon6-3, 6-4
2026-04-18vs BTC:Bloomfield Bobcats:DatskoLost 12
L#1 DoublesDouglas Bracken / Alex Romaine vs Andy King / Christopher Barnhart2-6, 6-2, 2-6
L#1 SinglesJohn Holschlag vs Mauricio Miranda4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesJason Sucoll / Eric Lutz vs Rostyk Datsko / Kevin Ho6-3, 1-6, 6-4
2026-04-04vs BTC:Bloomfield Bobcats:DatskoWon 21
W#1 DoublesDouglas Bracken / Alex Romaine vs Rostyk Datsko / Alex Gaal2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 SinglesJohn Holschlag vs Brandon Hermes6-2, 7-6
L#2 DoublesJason Sucoll / Ethan Na vs Christopher Barnhart / Andy King2-6, 3-6
W#1 DoublesDouglas Bracken / John Holschlag vs Adam Weinstein / Julien Novog-Desrayaud7-6, 5-7, 1-0
W#1 SinglesAndrew Martin vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesEric Lutz / Jason Sucoll vs N/A6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 5.0 Adult Men 1
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1EHTC:Hartford Hustle:Kaverud/Desrayaud#000000
2BTC:Bloomfield Bobcats:Datsko055920157
3RFL:5.0:Burda/Salak055921168
4BSF:Lobsters:Sucoll0613514158

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.44 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Brook Hazelton
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.64
John Holschlag
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
4.63
Douglas Bracken
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
4.56
Alex Romaine
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #1 Singles 17% · published 5
4.55
Jonathan Lippert
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
4.49
Andrew Martin
usually #1 Singles 77%, also #2 Singles 18% · published 4.5
4.44
Eli Phelps
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
4.37
Robert L Barton
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
4.36
Ethan Na
usually #1 Doubles 58%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
4.29
Eric Lutz
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
4.08
Jason Sucoll
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 13% · published
Dustin Parente
published
Shrey Choudhary
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jonathan Lippert + John Holschlag9164% games+7.9% vs expected
Jason Sucoll + Eric Lutz13457% games+1.0% vs expected
Jason Sucoll + Brook Hazelton5450% games−16.9% vs expected
Jason Sucoll + Douglas Bracken1443% gamesnot enough data
Douglas Bracken + John Holschlag404 matchesnot enough data
Jonathan Lippert + Brook Hazelton303 matchesnot enough data
Eric Lutz + Alex Romaine213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Brook Hazelton
18W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
John Holschlag
47W–10L career · 6 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.64
Douglas Bracken
51W–21L career · 6 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.63
5
Alex Romaine
10W–4L career · 6 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.56
Jonathan Lippert
28W–16L career · 2 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.55
4.5
Andrew Martin
28W–13L career · 17 lines in 2026
<1%52%48%
4.49
Eli Phelps
13W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%68%32%
4.44
Robert L Barton
42W–5L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%82%18%
4.37
Ethan Na
63W–39L career · 12 lines in 2026
<1%83%16%
4.36
Eric Lutz
22W–11L career · 10 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
4.29
Jason Sucoll
37W–27L career · 15 lines in 2026
27%72%<1%
4.08
Dustin Parente
5W–6L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Shrey Choudhary
2W–0L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.