Teams

GreyHawk - Hulbert

2023 Collier Adult 55 & Over Winter · Adult 55 & Over 8.0 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.90 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-03-06vs Pelican Marsh - PrenticeLost 01
L#3 DoublesMichelle Maggal / Jackie Gorinson vs Nancy Spiwak / Barclay Marcell6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2023-02-27Won 10
W#1 DoublesMichele Colgate / Judith Eckman vs Ellen Bedard / Marilyn Mooney6-7, 6-1, 1-0
2023-02-20vs Island Country Club - A.HeinauerWon 20
W#2 DoublesJudith Eckman / Michele Colgate vs Renee Facciola / Ann Pfister-Brown6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJackie Gorinson / Michelle Maggal vs Suzanne Messere / Kate McKee7-5, 4-6, 1-0
2023-02-06vs Lighthouse Bay - BroihanWon 10
W#2 DoublesMichele Colgate / Carol Halliday vs Susan Ash / Susan Broihan6-2, 6-1
2023-01-30vs Pelican Bay Park - NavarroLost 01
L#1 DoublesLisa Jess / Cathy Purvis vs Kristen Catino / Minde Shinnick4-6, 3-6
2023-01-28vs Naples Grande - J. FrankLost 03
L#1 DoublesLisa Jess / Cathy Purvis vs Kathy Healy / Cynthia Daly1-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesAngelika Dean / Michelle Maggal vs Candia Barry / Meg Perez2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesMichele Colgate / Donna Curry vs Joanne Belcastro / Marie Werthner2-6, 1-6
2023-01-16vs Grey Oaks - WerchekLost 01
L#3 DoublesMichele Colgate / Jill Hulbert vs Lisa McGillis / Joan Stolberg3-6, 1-6
2023-01-09vs COLLIER / L. KeillorLost 02
L#2 DoublesMichelle Maggal / Jackie Gorinson vs Catherine Barsky / Laurie Puddester3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDonna Curry / Michele Colgate vs Brenda Rhoda / Sunny Barger2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 55 & Over 8.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.63 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.96
Judith Eckman
published
3.87
Cathy Purvis
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.71
Carol Halliday
published 4
3.70
Donna Curry
published 4
3.62
Jackie Gorinson
published 4
3.41
Dina Viteretti
published 3.5
3.41
Mercedes Baumann
published
3.32
Michelle Maggal
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Michele Colgate
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Judith Eckman
9W–3L career · no lines in 2023
<1%61%39%
3.96
4
Cathy Purvis
59W–48L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%83%16%
3.87
4
Carol Halliday
69W–42L career · no lines in 2023
6%93%1%
3.71
4
Donna Curry
10W–10L career · no lines in 2023
6%93%1%
3.70
4
Jackie Gorinson
0W–3L career · no lines in 2023
19%81%<1%
3.62
3.5
Dina Viteretti
12W–14L career · no lines in 2023
<1%75%25%
3.41
Mercedes Baumann
76W–74L career · no lines in 2023
<1%75%25%
3.41
Michelle Maggal
169W–159L career · 4 lines in 2023
1%91%8%
3.32
Michele Colgate
25W–50L career · 6 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.