Teams

40+ 3.5 Moorehead - Starkville - SHS

2023 Adult 40 & Over-EC · Women 3.5

11 players · average NTRP 3.00 / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
L#1 DoublesKathy Kelly / Maggie Hamilton vs Melanie Crain / Missy Brown7-6, 5-7, 0-1
L#1 SinglesSarah Huerkamp vs Marjorie Williams4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesLynn Moorehead / Ketrina Young vs Tracy Provenza / Renee Gibbons6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLynsie Carpenter / Christy Dickerson vs Cheryl Andrews / Kevin Voller2-6, 0-6
W#1 DoublesKathy Kelly / Maggie Hamilton vs Melanie Crain / Renee Gibbons6-1, 7-6
W#1 SinglesSarah Huerkamp vs Marjorie Williams6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesLynsie Carpenter / Ketrina Young vs Pam Corban / Robbin Jones3-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesPatricia Faver / Rebecca Kraker vs Claire Spradling / Kevin Voller4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#1 DoublesKathy Kelly / Maggie Hamilton vs Cindy Lockhart / Melanie Crain1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#1 SinglesPatricia Faver vs Marjorie Williams1-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesLynn Moorehead / Rebecca Kraker vs Kevin Voller / Cheryl Andrews6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesAdriane Davis / Gena Standridge vs Tracy Provenza / Robbin Jones4-6, 3-6
L#1 DoublesKetrina Young / Christy Dickerson vs Tracy Provenza / Renee Gibbons1-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesSarah Huerkamp vs Marjorie Williams6-1, 7-6
W#2 DoublesLynn Moorehead / Linda Acy vs Claire Spradling / Missy Brown6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesGena Standridge / Adriane Davis vs Cheryl Andrews / Kevin Voller6-4, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.83 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.13
Maggie Hamilton
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.78
Linda Acy
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published
Adriane Davis
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
Christy Dickerson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 3
Gena Standridge
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.58
Patricia Faver
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published
Ketrina Young
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Lynn Moorehead
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Lynsie Carpenter
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Rebecca Kraker
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Sarah Huerkamp
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lynsie Carpenter + Christy Dickerson224 matchesnot enough data
Adriane Davis + Christy Dickerson044 matchesnot enough data
Ketrina Young + Patricia Faver123 matchesnot enough data
Ketrina Young + Christy Dickerson213 matchesnot enough data
Patricia Faver + Rebecca Kraker213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Maggie Hamilton
52W–47L career · 5 lines in 2023
17%83%<1%
3.13
Linda Acy
9W–17L career · 7 lines in 2023
2%94%4%
2.78
3
Adriane Davis
6W–19L career · 8 lines in 2023
not enough data
3
Christy Dickerson
15W–22L career · 8 lines in 2023
not enough data
3
Gena Standridge
13W–18L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Patricia Faver
14W–38L career · 9 lines in 2023
28%72%<1%
2.58
Ketrina Young
4W–13L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Lynn Moorehead
11W–32L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Lynsie Carpenter
4W–4L career · 6 lines in 2023
not enough data
Rebecca Kraker
8W–7L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Sarah Huerkamp
23W–13L career · 8 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.