Teams

baby got backhand

COMBO 18 & OVER · 5.5 WOMEN

13 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-10-07vs 5.5 Combo QueensWon 21
W#1 DoublesNurefsan Journigan / Raquel Morrison vs Dorothy Heath Morris / Porsche Polise-Zygler6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesCatherine Evanoff / Joyce Smith vs Kristen Iwashchenko / Hillary Nystrom6-1, 6-4
L#3 DoublesAshley Potter / JoAnne Willis vs Holly Foubister / Sarah Wongmanee1-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-09-30vs 5.5 Combo QueensLost 12
L#1 DoublesRachel Farmer / Radmila Matis vs Porsche Polise-Zygler / Inna Pencheva4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesTianna Stathis / Katelin Kight vs Michelle Donahue / Sarah Wongmanee3-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesEmma Turnbull / Heather Clark vs Peggy Stovall / Diane Klementowich6-2, 6-4
2025-09-23vs 5.5 Combo QueensWon 21
W#1 DoublesNurefsan Journigan / Rachel Farmer vs Brie Floyd / Sarah Wongmanee6-2, 7-5
L#2 DoublesLela Ingram / Katelin Kight vs Porsche Polise-Zygler / Michelle Donahue2-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesTianna Stathis / Catherine Evanoff vs Hillary Nystrom / Olga Perry6-0, 6-0
2025-09-16vs 5.5 Combo QueensLost 12
L#1 DoublesTianna Stathis / Raquel Morrison vs Porsche Polise-Zygler / Brie Floyd3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesJoyce Smith / Catherine Evanoff vs Veronica Kent / Holly Foubister6-7, 2-6
W#3 DoublesAshley Potter / Heather Clark vs Michelle Donahue / Mica Manson6-4, 6-2
2025-09-09vs 5.5 Combo QueensWon 21
W#1 DoublesEmma Turnbull / Katelin Kight vs Veronica Kent / Hillary Nystrom6-2, 0-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesRachel Farmer / Joyce Smith vs Kristen Iwashchenko / Diane Klementowich6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesLela Ingram / JoAnne Willis vs Leela Harpur / Olga Perry4-6, 2-6
2025-09-02vs 5.5 Combo QueensLost 12
W#1 DoublesEmma Turnbull / Rachel Farmer vs Inna Pencheva / Holly Foubister7-5, 6-4
L#2 DoublesTianna Stathis / JoAnne Willis vs Brie Floyd / Porsche Polise-Zygler0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesLela Ingram / Katelin Kight vs Peggy Stovall / Diane Klementowich5-7, 5-7
2025-08-26vs 5.5 Combo QueensWon 21
W#1 DoublesNurefsan Journigan / Rachel Farmer vs Leela Harpur / Porsche Polise-Zygler6-4, 7-5
L#2 DoublesJoyce Smith / Katelin Kight vs Veronica Kent / Sarah Wongmanee5-7, 2-6
W#3 DoublesMargaret Northrup / JoAnne Willis vs Kristen Iwashchenko / Mica Manson6-3, 6-1
2025-08-19vs 5.5 Combo QueensWon 30
W#1 DoublesEmma Turnbull / Rachel Farmer vs Brie Floyd / Holly Foubister6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesTianna Stathis / Catherine Evanoff vs Michelle Donahue / Hillary Nystrom4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAshley Potter / JoAnne Willis vs Dorothy Heath Morris / Olga Perry6-1, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 5.5 WOMEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.84 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.27
Emma Turnbull
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
3.22
Nurefsan Journigan
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.94
Radmila Matis
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.90
Catherine Evanoff
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published 3
2.89
Ashley Potter
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.86
Tianna Stathis
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
2.79
Joyce Smith
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.73
Margaret Northrup
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.58
Katelin Kight
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.56
Raquel Morrison
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.51
JoAnne Willis
usually #2 Doubles 58%, also #3 Doubles 42% · published
Lela Ingram
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Mary Toohey
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Joyce Smith + Catherine Evanoff213 matchesnot enough data
Tianna Stathis + Emma Turnbull303 matchesnot enough data
JoAnne Willis + Katelin Kight303 matchesnot enough data
JoAnne Willis + Lela Ingram123 matchesnot enough data
Katelin Kight + Raquel Morrison303 matchesnot enough data
Katelin Kight + Catherine Evanoff303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Emma Turnbull
57W–20L career · 8 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
Nurefsan Journigan
22W–20L career · 6 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.22
Radmila Matis
18W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%67%33%
2.94
3
Catherine Evanoff
24W–17L career · 10 lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
2.90
3
Ashley Potter
10W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
2.89
Tianna Stathis
36W–16L career · 10 lines in 2025
<1%83%17%
2.86
Joyce Smith
24W–32L career · 4 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
2.79
Margaret Northrup
3W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
97%3%<1%
2.73
Katelin Kight
28W–26L career · 10 lines in 2025
0%29%71%
2.58
Raquel Morrison
26W–20L career · 6 lines in 2025
32%68%<1%
2.56
JoAnne Willis
36W–27L career · 12 lines in 2025
0%46%54%
2.51
Lela Ingram
10W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Mary Toohey
4W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.