Teams

CROWN GOLD

2026 USTA ADULT 65 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 8.0 - 65 & OVER - DEN

7 players · average NTRP 3.86 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-07-26vs HMTC REDWon 21
W#1 DoublesJudy Spasser / Nancy Zeigel vs Debbie Neumaier / Lori Buderus1-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDenison Levy / Denise Faber vs Peggy Johnson / Priscilla Dressen6-7, 4-6
W#3 DoublesSusan Cheney / Diane Boat vs Vicki Davis / Jeannette Popp7-5, 4-6, 1-0
2026-07-25vs CSRC NAVYWon 21
W#1 DoublesNancy Zeigel / Judy Spasser vs Denise Munafo / Margaret Molek-Otto6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesSusan Cheney / Anne Sale vs Cynthia MacE Sullivan / Kady Hommel6-0, 6-0
L#3 DoublesDenise Faber / Paula Ponto vs Rona Clark / Tracy Brogan6-2, 1-6, 1-0
2026-07-24vs CSRC NAVYWon 30
W#1 DoublesJudy Spasser / Denison Levy vs Denise Munafo / Tracy Brogan4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesNancy Zeigel / Denise Faber vs Margaret Molek-Otto / Ann Baldwin6-4, 6-0
W#3 DoublesSusan Cheney / Diane Boat vs Amy Laird / Kady Hommel7-6, 6-2
2026-07-24vs HMTC REDWon 30
W#1 DoublesNancy Zeigel / Judy Spasser vs Debbie Neumaier / Lynn Clay6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesSusan Cheney / Anne Sale vs Vicki Davis / Jeannette Popp6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesDenise Faber / Paula Ponto vs Renee Gerrick / Sharon Sturges6-1, 1-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 8.0 - 65 & OVER - DEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.65 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.00
Judy Spasser
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.73
Denise Faber
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.66
Nancy Zeigel
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.65
Paula Ponto
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.64
Denison Levy
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.43
Diane Boat
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.42
Anne Sale
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nancy Zeigel + Judy Spasser11358% games+3.3% vs expected
Denison Levy + Judy Spasser17855% gamesnot enough data
Denison Levy + Paula Ponto6348% gamesnot enough data
Nancy Zeigel + Paula Ponto2450% gamesnot enough data
Anne Sale + Diane Boat213 matchesnot enough data
Judy Spasser + Paula Ponto303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Judy Spasser
54W–21L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%50%50%
4.00
4
Denise Faber
105W–96L career · 4 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Nancy Zeigel
63W–59L career · 4 lines in 2026
10%89%<1%
3.66
4
Paula Ponto
40W–33L career · 2 lines in 2026
12%88%<1%
3.65
4
Denison Levy
37W–24L career · 2 lines in 2026
15%85%<1%
3.64
3.5
Diane Boat
65W–37L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%70%30%
3.43
3.5
Anne Sale
88W–37L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%73%27%
3.42

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.