Teams

Seminole Slashers

2022 Pinellas Trilevel 18 & Over Fall · 4.0

9 players · average NTRP 3.83 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-10-09vs Pinellas/NextGen - DonahueWon 20
W#2 DoublesJose Jarabo / Israel Graveran vs Joe Faraci / Peter Martino6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKevin Dooling / Daniel McKinney vs Kalicharan Durgampudi / Edward Lindblom6-1, 6-3
2022-10-09Won 10
W#3 DoublesPaul Brown / Kevin Dooling vs Jorge Alvarado / Sanjay Konda6-1, 6-0
2022-10-08vs Pinellas/NextGen - DonahueLost 02
L#2 DoublesJack Morris / Jose Dsa vs Joe Faraci / James Price4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesDaniel McKinney / Kevin Dooling vs Kalicharan Durgampudi / Edward Lindblom6-0, 4-6, 0-1
2022-10-08vs Pinellas/NextGen - DonahueSplit 11
L#2 DoublesJose Jarabo / Israel Graveran vs Alan Chin / Joe Faraci7-6, 5-7, 0-1
W#3 DoublesDaniel McKinney / Kevin Dooling vs Jorge Alvarado / Sanjay Konda6-4, 6-3
2022-10-08vs Pinellas/NextGen - DonahueLost 01
L#1 DoublesJose Jarabo / Mauricio Caccia vs Hiren Bhatt / Nam HO6-7, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.56 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.90
David Palmer
published 4
3.89
Brian Hodapp
published 4
3.83
Israel Graveran
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.78
Jose Jarabo
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
Jack Morris
published 4
3.43
Gary Hutton
published 4
3.26
Kevin Dooling
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.18
Daniel McKinney
published 3.5
3.17
Jose Dsa
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

David Palmer + Brian Hodapp7162% games+1.6% vs expected
Israel Graveran + Jose Jarabo213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
David Palmer
16W–7L career · no lines in 2022
<1%77%23%
3.90
4
Brian Hodapp
12W–7L career · no lines in 2022
<1%79%21%
3.89
4
Israel Graveran
98W–46L career · 2 lines in 2022
1%90%10%
3.83
4
Jose Jarabo
112W–54L career · 3 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.78
4
Jack Morris
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Gary Hutton
3W–7L career · no lines in 2022
69%31%<1%
3.43
3.5
Kevin Dooling
42W–42L career · 4 lines in 2022
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Daniel McKinney
4W–5L career · no lines in 2022
9%91%1%
3.18
3.5
Jose Dsa
121W–100L career · 1 line in 2022
10%90%1%
3.17

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.