Teams

Eagle Harbor - Rouse

2026 Duval Adult 40 & Over - Women · 3.0 Adult 40 & Over

16 players · average NTRP 3.00 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-03-15vs Palencia - MartyakLost 23
W#1 DoublesKelly Glavin / Stephanie Rouse vs Lanay Gearhart / Michelle Meyer-Devlin6-3, 6-4
L#1 SinglesDaiva Nixon vs Connie Ayer6-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesPam Fritz / Lori Mercer vs Valerie Dolan / Tracy Smith4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesDeana Jones / Patricia Linge vs Doris Beaton / Maria Diamond0-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#4 DoublesSita Shah / Beth Jansen vs Cristin Lindroos / Alexis Kokolias3-6, 2-6
2026-03-08vs FYC - TorresWon 31
W#1 DoublesStephanie Rouse / Kristen Hughes vs Adrienne Kent / Melinda Gibbs6-1, 7-5
L#1 SinglesTheresa Cumpstone vs Stephanie Wilder1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesDeana Jones / Lori Mercer vs Raeanne McCarty / Holly Williams4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSarah Cornell / Beth Jansen vs Tara Volpe / Cheryl Virta2-6, 7-6, 1-0
2026-03-01vs Southside - AtkinsWon 10
W#4 DoublesDaiva Nixon / Elaine Paschal vs Teresa Matthews / Lori Osachy3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2026-02-26vs Duval/BoretskyWon 41
L#1 DoublesDeana Jones / Daiva Nixon vs Mandy Riceman / Anna Harper4-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesErica Washkill vs Jacqueline Boretsky6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesStephanie Rouse / Kelly Glavin vs Denise Darracott / Debra Reisner6-3, 6-0
W#3 DoublesSarah Cornell / Anne Kugler vs Joanne Esch / Patricia Lombardo6-3, 6-4
W#4 DoublesSita Shah / Pam Fritz vs Susan Powell / Brenda Byman6-2, 6-3
2026-02-22vs San Jose - de AndradeLost 23
L#1 DoublesDeana Jones / Kelly Glavin vs Ali Griffin / Carissa Hammel2-6, 6-7
L#1 SinglesTheresa Cumpstone vs Amy Malaikham4-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesPatricia Linge / Daiva Nixon vs Stacy Clark / Margaret Samuels5-7, 4-6
W#3 DoublesErica Washkill / Pam Fritz vs Jami Bueker / Dixie McDaniel de Andrade6-4, 7-6
W#4 DoublesCristina Thomas / Elaine Paschal vs Amelia Smith / MELINDA M STIVERS7-5, 4-6, 1-0
2026-01-25vs Eagle Landing - BrinkSplit 11
W#3 DoublesDeana Jones / Kelly Glavin vs Tiffany Carnes / Mary Moody6-2, 6-4
L#4 DoublesPatricia Linge / Beth Jansen vs June Bliss / Kristen Trinca6-7, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Adult 40 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.78 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.98
Kelly Glavin
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.91
Pam Fritz
usually #4 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.88
Deana Jones
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.87
Daiva Nixon
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
2.83
Lori Mercer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.80
Erica Washkill
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.78
Patricia Linge
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.76
Stephanie Rouse
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Anne Kugler
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Cristina Thomas
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.71
Sarah Cornell
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.67
Sita Shah
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
2.62
Theresa Cumpstone
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.58
Beth Jansen
usually #4 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
Elaine Paschal
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
Kristen Hughes
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stephanie Rouse + Kelly Glavin213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kelly Glavin
4W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%56%44%
2.98
Pam Fritz
11W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%<1%>99%
2.91
3
Deana Jones
9W–5L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%79%20%
2.88
3
Daiva Nixon
10W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%82%17%
2.87
Lori Mercer
12W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%87%12%
2.83
Erica Washkill
9W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%91%8%
2.80
Patricia Linge
7W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
2.78
Stephanie Rouse
5W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
2.76
3
Anne Kugler
2W–0L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
3
Cristina Thomas
1W–0L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Sarah Cornell
3W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
2.71
Sita Shah
2W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
12%87%1%
2.67
Theresa Cumpstone
1W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
20%80%<1%
2.62
3
Beth Jansen
4W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
29%71%<1%
2.58
Elaine Paschal
2W–0L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Kristen Hughes
8W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.