Teams

LA-WC-HitWomen

2025 USTA Adult 40 & Over – LA · LA - Women 4.5

20 players · average NTRP 4.50 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
L#1 DoublesKaren Hankinson / Carrie Haber vs Julie Flygare / Yuri Nichelson6-4, 0-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesLisa Novajosky / Darcy Simon vs Mandi Collier / Stephanie Ellis2-6, 2-6
2025-03-16vs LA - Kiss My Ace 4.5Won 10
W#3 DoublesGloria Geller / Mimi Kahn vs Kimberly Strickland / JANE CHUN6-4, 6-0
2025-03-03vs LA - Team AllisonWon 10
W#1 DoublesKaren Hankinson / Darcy Simon vs Sherryl Chaffin / Jana Conley6-1, 6-1
2025-02-15vs LA - Kiss My Ace 4.5Won 30
W#1 DoublesLisa Novajosky / Darcy Simon vs MINA RICABAR / Jennie Speciale6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKaren Hankinson / Deanna Schlesinger vs Mala Lee / Kimberly Strickland6-1, 7-5
W#3 DoublesGloria Geller / Maria de Carvalho vs Tiffany Lee / Vilayvanh Shah6-1, 6-2
L#1 DoublesLisa Novajosky / Darcy Simon vs Yuri Nichelson / Stephanie Ellis4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMonica Johnson / Gloria Geller vs Julie Flygare / Mandi Collier6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2025-01-26vs LA - Kiss My Ace 4.5Won 10
W#1 DoublesKaren Hankinson / Julie Juliani vs Caridad Coto / JANE CHUN7-5, 6-2
2025-01-18vs LA - Team AllisonWon 10
W#1 DoublesKaren Hankinson / Darcy Simon vs Sherryl Chaffin / Alison Harma6-1, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for LA - Women 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.15 estimated across 18 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.49
Darcy Simon
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 5
4.47
Jennifer Prakash
published
4.37
Lisa Novajosky
published
4.37
Cindy Shin
published 4.5
4.36
Karen Hankinson
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
4.28
Alexia Monti
published 4.5
Carrie Haber
published 4.5
4.16
Nicole Buckland
published
4.16
Maria de Carvalho
published
4.16
Mimi Kahn
published
4.15
Gloria Geller
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.04
Joanna Morley
published
4.02
Marion Galliford
published
4.02
Alana Prisco
published 4.5
3.99
Carrie Kisker
published 4.5
3.95
Joanna Ku
published
3.94
AB Young
published 4
3.90
Cindy Suby
published 4.5
3.84
Olivia Burtis
published
Julie Juliani
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Karen Hankinson + Maria de Carvalho4255% games+2.8% vs expected
Karen Hankinson + Darcy Simon10655% games+0.5% vs expected
Karen Hankinson + Gloria Geller314 matchesnot enough data
Joanna Morley + Jennifer Prakash404 matchesnot enough data
Maria de Carvalho + Gloria Geller123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Darcy Simon
96W–61L career · 5 lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.49
Jennifer Prakash
10W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%58%42%
4.47
Lisa Novajosky
11W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%81%18%
4.37
4.5
Cindy Shin
11W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%83%17%
4.37
4.5
Karen Hankinson
131W–70L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%84%15%
4.36
4.5
Alexia Monti
7W–2L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
4.28
4.5
Carrie Haber
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Nicole Buckland
5W–5L career · no lines in 2025
13%87%1%
4.16
Maria de Carvalho
9W–11L career · no lines in 2025
13%87%1%
4.16
Mimi Kahn
3W–4L career · no lines in 2025
13%87%1%
4.16
4.5
Gloria Geller
139W–102L career · 3 lines in 2025
14%85%1%
4.15
Joanna Morley
11W–1L career · no lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
4.04
Marion Galliford
3W–5L career · no lines in 2025
44%56%<1%
4.02
4.5
Alana Prisco
12W–5L career · no lines in 2025
45%55%<1%
4.02
4.5
Carrie Kisker
6W–7L career · no lines in 2025
52%48%<1%
3.99
Joanna Ku
8W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%63%37%
3.95
4
AB Young
4W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%67%33%
3.94
4.5
Cindy Suby
1W–6L career · no lines in 2025
76%24%<1%
3.90
Olivia Burtis
4W–9L career · no lines in 2025
88%12%<1%
3.84
Julie Juliani
4W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.