Teams

J'ADORR

Mixed 18 & Over · 10.0 Mixed Doubles

12 players · average NTRP 4.80 / PHILADELPHIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-04-11vs Ka-PaoWon 21
W#1 DoublesRaphael Termat / Candice Wang vs Kamala Kannan / Camille Townsend4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesEva Frissora / Adam Townsend vs Michael Litz / Sasha Radulski4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesCorey Garnier / Alison Isaac vs Garrison Kinney / Chloe Ouellet-Pizer5-7, 4-6
2026-03-27vs PipkinWon 20
W#1 DoublesEva Frissora / Kai Czubryt-Ogino vs Hannah Pipkin / Dave Musser6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesEric Spangler / Candice Wang vs Rushi Amin / Stephanie Drake6-7, 7-5, 1-0
2026-03-07vs Ka-PaoLost 12
L#1 DoublesKai Czubryt-Ogino / Alison Isaac vs Anita Kurimay / Kamala Kannan1-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 DoublesAlexis Dorr / Adam Townsend vs Chloe Ouellet-Pizer / Michael Litz5-7, 0-6
W#3 DoublesMatthew Cherner-Ranft / Candice Wang vs Kevin Weber / Sasha Radulski7-6, 6-2
2026-02-27vs PipkinLost 12
L#1 DoublesCandice Wang / Raphael Termat vs Madison Pipkin / Dave Musser6-7, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesEric Spangler / Alexis Dorr vs Rushi Amin / Jasmine Nichole Shaw-Morris6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesEva Frissora / Corey Garnier vs Hannah Pipkin / Jeremy Kochman6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2026-02-20vs PipkinWon 30
W#1 DoublesEva Frissora / Kai Czubryt-Ogino vs Madison Pipkin / Dave Musser7-6, 7-6
W#2 DoublesAlexis Dorr / Matthew Cherner-Ranft vs Hannah Pipkin / Rushi Amin6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesAlison Isaac / Adam Townsend vs Danila Kourkoulin / Stephanie Drake6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2026-01-23vs Ka-PaoLost 12
L#1 DoublesCandice Wang / Raphael Termat vs Kamala Kannan / Chloe Ouellet-Pizer2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMatthew Cherner-Ranft / Alexis Dorr vs Eric Ripkin / Mo Bertsch7-6, 6-3
L#3 DoublesAdam Townsend / Greta Koch vs Jennifer Pao / Tommy Meyer3-6, 1-6
2025-11-22vs Ka-PaoLost 12
W#1 DoublesRaphael Termat / Candice Wang vs Anita Kurimay / Eric Ripkin6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesEva Frissora / Corey Garnier vs Chloe Ouellet-Pizer / Kevin Weber3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMatthew Cherner-Ranft / Greta Koch vs Roxanne Chouinard / Garrison Kinney6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2025-11-07vs PipkinSplit 11
W#1 DoublesAlexis Dorr / Raphael Termat vs Chanel Brown / Danila Kourkoulin7-6, 7-6
L#3 DoublesCorey Garnier / Alison Isaac vs Cassidy Cruz / Jeremy Kochman5-7, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 10.0 Mixed Doubles
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Ka-Pao0818616183
2J'ADORR08131128243

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.67 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

5.23
Alison Isaac
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 5.5
5.00
Eric Spangler
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
4.89
Raphael Termat
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.77
Alexis Dorr
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 5
4.51
Candice Wang
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 4.5
4.45
Corey Garnier
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published 4.5
4.41
Kai Czubryt-Ogino
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.38
Adam Townsend
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.38
Greta Koch
usually #3 Doubles 56%, also #1 Doubles 22% · published
Eva Frissora
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Matthew Cherner-Ranft
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Yulia Bolotova
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Corey Garnier + Greta Koch8357% games−0.9% vs expected
Alexis Dorr + Matthew Cherner-Ranft404 matchesnot enough data
Raphael Termat + Candice Wang224 matchesnot enough data
Eva Frissora + Matthew Cherner-Ranft404 matchesnot enough data
Corey Garnier + Alexis Dorr123 matchesnot enough data
Corey Garnier + Eva Frissora123 matchesnot enough data
Alexis Dorr + Adam Townsend213 matchesnot enough data
Eric Spangler + Eva Frissora213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5.5
Alison Isaac
1W–3L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
5.23
Eric Spangler
21W–8L career · 6 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
5.00
Raphael Termat
10W–4L career · 5 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.89
5
Alexis Dorr
28W–15L career · 5 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.77
4.5
Candice Wang
5W–4L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%46%54%
4.51
4.5
Corey Garnier
64W–35L career · 10 lines in 2026
<1%65%35%
4.45
Kai Czubryt-Ogino
85W–35L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%75%25%
4.41
4.5
Adam Townsend
38W–19L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
4.38
Greta Koch
29W–15L career · 9 lines in 2026
<1%80%19%
4.38
Eva Frissora
30W–10L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data
Matthew Cherner-Ranft
11W–2L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Yulia Bolotova
22W–7L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.