Teams

Yadkin/Bledsoe/18 3.0 Singles

2025 Yadkin Valley Singles 18 & Over · Men 3.0 - Thursday Night

6 players · average NTRP / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-07-31vs Yadkin/Kagan-Brown/18 3.0Lost 02
L#1 SinglesSeth Krautwurst vs Drew Brackett0-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesJohn Merriam vs Jack Kagan5-7, 6-4, 0-1
2025-07-24Split 11
W#1 SinglesMichael Glontz vs Jack Kagan2-6, 6-0, 1-0
L#2 SinglesYOU JUNG vs Ryan Brown6-2, 6-7, 0-1
2025-07-17vs Yadkin/Kagan-Brown/18 3.0Lost 12
L#1 SinglesJohn Merriam vs Ryan Brown4-6, 6-7
L#2 SinglesTravis Gable vs Drew Brackett3-6, 0-6
W#3 SinglesMichael Glontz vs Ben Ward6-0, 6-0
2025-07-10vs Yadkin/Kagan-Brown/18 3.0Lost 12
W#1 SinglesYOU JUNG vs Kyle Poole6-2, 7-5
L#2 SinglesMitchell Bledsoe vs Drew Brackett1-6, 0-6
L#3 SinglesSeth Krautwurst vs Jack Kagan5-7, 0-6
2025-07-03vs Yadkin/Kagan-Brown/18 3.0Lost 03
L#1 SinglesMichael Glontz vs Ryan Brown3-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesYOU JUNG vs Drew Brackett5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 SinglesJohn Merriam vs Jack Kagan6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2025-06-26vs Yadkin/Kagan-Brown/18 3.0Lost 12
W#1 SinglesTravis Gable vs Ryan Brown6-4, 6-2
L#2 SinglesMitchell Bledsoe vs Drew Brackett1-6, 0-6
L#3 SinglesSeth Krautwurst vs Jack Kagan1-6, 3-6
2025-06-12vs Yadkin/Kagan-Brown/18 3.0Won 21
W#1 SinglesYOU JUNG vs Ben Ward6-0, 6-1
L#2 SinglesJohn Merriam vs Drew Brackett7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 SinglesTravis Gable vs Jack Kagan6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2025-06-05vs Yadkin/Kagan-Brown/18 3.0Won 21
L#1 SinglesMitchell Bledsoe vs Ryan Brown3-6, 0-6
W#2 SinglesJohn Merriam vs Kyle Poole6-1, 6-3
W#3 SinglesMichael Glontz vs Ben Ward6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men 3.0 - Thursday Night have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.60 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.74
Michael Glontz
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published
2.70
YOU JUNG
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
2.56
Travis Gable
usually #3 Singles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
2.55
John Merriam
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 33% · published
2.44
Seth Krautwurst
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Mitchell Bledsoe
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Michael Glontz
9W–10L career · 4 lines in 2025
4%93%3%
2.74
YOU JUNG
6W–9L career · 4 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
2.70
Travis Gable
4W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
34%66%<1%
2.56
John Merriam
4W–15L career · 6 lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
2.55
Seth Krautwurst
1W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
67%33%<1%
2.44
Mitchell Bledsoe
0W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.