Teams

CROW CANYON CC CW8.5A

2021 COMBO · Women 8.5

12 players · average NTRP 4.17 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-12-05vs PLEASANTON CW8.5BWon 20
W#1 DoublesVal Lacommare / Tracy Leeds vs In Bum Kim / Vanessa S Weeks6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKathryn Hawkins / Lisa Herman vs Jessica Abels / Farrell Scott6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2021-11-20vs SUNNYVALE TC/SUNNYVALE MTC CW8.5BWon 10
W#1 DoublesLaurie Radanovich / Tracy Leeds vs Patricia Birks / Julie Colwell6-3, 6-0
2021-11-06vs Bay Club Fremont CW8.5AWon 10
W#1 DoublesVal Lacommare / Tracy Leeds vs Stella Liang / Lucy Pan6-4, 6-2
L#1 DoublesDiane R Adams / Kathryn Hawkins vs Sandra Jones / Shin Koo5-7, 1-6
2021-10-10vs BAY TREES PK CW8.5BSplit 11
W#1 DoublesVal Lacommare / Tracy Leeds vs Jennifer Lawson / Rachelle Peralta6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesKathryn Hawkins / Fran Hazell vs Mika Tsuchiiwa / Yuka Ueda1-6, 2-6
2021-10-03Won 10
W#1 DoublesDiane R Adams / Tracy Leeds vs Elizabeth Leitner / Sara Pawloski6-4, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 8.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.85 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.13
Val Lacommare
published
3.98
Kal Peters
published
3.93
Allyson Berry
published 4.5
3.93
Tracy Leeds
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.89
Sharon Ressa
published
3.82
Laurie Radanovich
published
3.61
3.52
Fran Hazell
published 4
Karen Cardinal
published
Kathleen Gerhart
published
Kathryn Hawkins
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Lisa Herman
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sharon Ressa + Laurie Radanovich224 matchesnot enough data
Val Lacommare + Kal Peters123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Val Lacommare
4W–3L career · no lines in 2021
16%84%<1%
4.13
Kal Peters
1W–8L career · no lines in 2021
57%43%<1%
3.98
4.5
Allyson Berry
0W–4L career · no lines in 2021
70%30%<1%
3.93
Tracy Leeds
96W–40L career · 8 lines in 2021
<1%71%29%
3.93
Sharon Ressa
19W–7L career · no lines in 2021
<1%81%19%
3.89
Laurie Radanovich
44W–12L career · no lines in 2021
1%91%8%
3.82
4
Adrienne Cummings
6W–3L career · no lines in 2021
20%80%<1%
3.61
4
Fran Hazell
8W–10L career · no lines in 2021
44%56%<1%
3.52
Karen Cardinal
0W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Kathleen Gerhart
0W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Kathryn Hawkins
18W–38L career · 8 lines in 2021
not enough data
Lisa Herman
6W–3L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.