Teams

LBK Public Aitken

2025 Sarasota Adult 65 & Over Winter · 8.0 W Friday

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_5

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-03-14vs LWR No Drama MamasLost 01
L#3 DoublesBettye Sykes / Margaret Stanton vs Wendy Zevin / Linda Frazier6-0, 6-7, 0-1
2025-03-07Lost 01
L#3 DoublesArden Allen / Faye Blakely vs Maureen Boyd / Barbara Aichinger5-7, 2-6
2025-02-28vs LBK Club BavelyWon 10
W#3 DoublesBettye Sykes / Margaret Stanton vs Dana Lamont / Karen Nejdawi4-6, 7-5, 1-0
2025-02-14Lost 01
L#3 DoublesBettye Sykes / Molly Gleason vs Betty Jo Zeigler / Kathleen Torrell1-6, 5-7
2025-02-07Lost 01
L#3 DoublesFaye Blakely / Margaret Stanton vs Hattie Grimsley / Barbara Aichinger6-7, 2-6
2025-01-31Lost 01
L#3 DoublesFaye Blakely / Molly Gleason vs Dorene Seider / Susan Marro1-6, 3-6
2025-01-17vs LBK Club BavelyWon 20
W#2 DoublesFaye Blakely / Gail Russell vs Karen Byles / Susan Travers6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMargaret Stanton / Bettye Sykes vs Linda Gillott / Karen Nejdawi6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 W Friday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.28 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.67
Mary Jane Waite
published
3.32
Gail Russell
published 3.5
3.29
Faye Blakely
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.25
Bettye Sykes
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.12
Molly Gleason
published
3.02
Ann Kelmenson
published 3.5
Karen Jennings
published
Karen Kurgan
published
Margaret Stanton
published
Peggy Lavallee
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Faye Blakely + Ann Kelmenson123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mary Jane Waite
50W–38L career · no lines in 2025
10%90%1%
3.67
3.5
Gail Russell
8W–9L career · no lines in 2025
1%91%9%
3.32
3.5
Faye Blakely
56W–62L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%93%6%
3.29
3.5
Bettye Sykes
84W–81L career · 4 lines in 2025
3%95%3%
3.25
Molly Gleason
3W–6L career · no lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
3.12
3.5
Ann Kelmenson
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
43%57%<1%
3.02
Karen Jennings
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Karen Kurgan
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Margaret Stanton
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Peggy Lavallee
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.