Teams

Wimberly - RS Clay

2023 Escambia Adult 40 & Over · 3.5 Adult 40 & Over - Men

9 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_1

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-03-28vs Snyder - PCCWon 20
W#1 DoublesKirk Bradley / George Rials vs Alex Hyde-White / Alexander Moore6-3, 6-0
W#2 DoublesJohn Wimberly / Eric Stewart vs Brett Snyder / Blair Crooke1-0
2023-03-21vs Fuentealba - SHLLost 02
L#1 DoublesGeorge Rials / Kirk Bradley vs Timothy Sumrall / Nick Farkas5-7, 6-0, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJohn Wimberly / Kenneth Wallace vs Arthur Phillips / Doug Gonterman5-7, 6-7
2023-03-14vs Whittenberger - RS ClayLost 01
L#1 DoublesKenneth Wallace / George Rials vs Todd Fisher / James Richardson6-7, 1-6
2023-03-07Won 10
W#2 DoublesJohn Wimberly / Peter Gilroy vs David Stafford / John M Kizziah6-1, 7-6
2023-02-28vs Fuentealba - SHLWon 20
W#1 SinglesGeorge Rials vs Arturo Ojeda Peraza6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJohn Wimberly / Kenneth Wallace vs Timothy Sumrall / Marco Fuentealba6-3, 7-5
2023-02-21vs Whittenberger - RS ClayLost 01
L#1 DoublesGeorge Rials / John Wimberly vs James Richardson / Todd Fisher4-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Adult 40 & Over - Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.31 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.58
Kirk Bradley
published
3.50
George Rials
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 3.5
3.40
Ed Souza
published
3.31
Eric Stewart
published
3.22
Kenneth Wallace
published
3.22
Andrew Hillman
published 3.5
2.97
Glenn Langan
published
John Wimberly
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Russell Ball
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Andrew Hillman + Eric Stewart2548% games+0.5% vs expected
John Wimberly + George Rials123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kirk Bradley
3W–18L career · no lines in 2023
30%70%<1%
3.58
3.5
George Rials
95W–44L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%49%51%
3.50
Ed Souza
5W–4L career · no lines in 2023
<1%76%24%
3.40
Eric Stewart
18W–22L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%8%
3.31
Kenneth Wallace
14W–15L career · no lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.22
3.5
Andrew Hillman
10W–12L career · no lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.22
Glenn Langan
4W–18L career · no lines in 2023
58%42%<1%
2.97
John Wimberly
123W–97L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
Russell Ball
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.