Teams

LFoose (Park Road)

2024 Adult 18 & Over League · 18 & Over Adult 3.5 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.81 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2024-05-02vs PGatewood (Charlotte CC)Won 10
W#2 DoublesKaren Hillard / Allison Moss vs Melissa Lovett / Brandon Boyd6-2, 6-4
2024-04-26vs KWard/VWade (Jeff Adams)Won 10
W#1 DoublesAllison Moss / Karen Hillard vs Madelaine LeBlanc / Dana Adams6-1, 6-1
2024-04-25vs MSevigny (Carmel)Won 10
W#2 DoublesLogan Foose / Brooke Kern - (DQ) vs Jessica Abrams / Carrie Carickhoff6-2, 6-1
2024-04-19vs MWebb/BMarks (PCC)Won 10
W#2 DoublesLogan Foose / Brooke Kern - (DQ) vs Anna Troppmann / Lisa Long6-0, 6-3
2024-04-05vs VKoskinas (WSRC)Won 10
W#1 DoublesLogan Foose / Brooke Kern - (DQ) vs Brandi Hoover / April Greer6-2, 6-4
2024-03-22vs NMcvicker (Queens)Won 10
W#1 DoublesAllison Moss / Karen Hillard vs Ann Meadows / Maebeth Hill6-2, 7-5
2024-03-15vs KCiminelli (Life Time)Won 20
W#1 DoublesMegan McKeever / Karen Hillard vs Kathleen Ciminelli / Rebecca Danguy6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesLogan Foose / Allison Worthington vs Leezah Pratt / Lea Powell6-4, 6-3
2024-03-12vs MZvara (Park Road)Won 10
W#1 DoublesMegan McKeever / Karen Hillard vs Annie Spence / Graye Todd6-2, 6-2
2024-03-08vs KSarjeant (Queens)Won 10
W#2 DoublesLogan Foose / Brooke Kern - (DQ) vs Dawn VanHoy / Katie Sarjeant6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Adult 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.62 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.06
Brooke Kern
published 4.5
4.05
Mallory Miller
published
3.85
3.74
Megan McKeever
published
3.74
Caroline Withers
published 3.5
3.58
Karen Hillard
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.54
Logan Foose
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.51
Kristy Boyles
published
3.46
Christina Brunnemer
published 3.5
3.36
Kathy Gilchrist
published
3.30
Amy Schaaf
published 3.5
3.29
Allison Moss
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kathy Gilchrist + Kristy Boyles224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Brooke Kern
4W–1L career · no lines in 2024
32%68%<1%
4.06
Mallory Miller
20W–5L career · no lines in 2024
<1%35%65%
4.05
4
Allison Worthington
7W–2L career · no lines in 2024
1%85%14%
3.85
Megan McKeever
11W–4L career · no lines in 2024
<1%4%96%
3.74
3.5
Caroline Withers
16W–3L career · no lines in 2024
<1%4%96%
3.74
4
Karen Hillard
46W–20L career · 5 lines in 2024
29%71%<1%
3.58
4
Logan Foose
23W–10L career · 10 lines in 2024
39%61%<1%
3.54
Kristy Boyles
4W–8L career · no lines in 2024
47%53%<1%
3.51
3.5
Christina Brunnemer
3W–2L career · no lines in 2024
<1%62%38%
3.46
Kathy Gilchrist
4W–5L career · no lines in 2024
84%16%<1%
3.36
3.5
Amy Schaaf
6W–6L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%8%
3.30
3.5
Allison Moss
7W–5L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.29

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.