Teams

BC-MiraCosta/ElizabethPark

2024 SO CAL DOUBLES - Beach Cities · BC Women - 3.5

18 players · average NTRP 3.25 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for BC Women - 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.12 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.87
Andrea Torng
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.41
Elizabeth Park
published
3.33
Jackie Kim
published
3.30
Yuka McLeod
published
3.20
Colleen Johnson
published 3.5
3.12
Melissa Wolgang
published
3.08
Emily Ashby
published
3.00
Wendy Finster
published
2.99
Claudina Mercado
published 3
2.77
Stephanie Hanger
published
Ara Cho
published 3
Brenda Phongsa
published 3
2.70
Thu Hoai Yanase
published
2.69
Diane Pryzbylo
published 3
Gabriele Engelhardt
published
Kathleen Richter
published
Lindsay Newby-Snode
published
Yuka Ohtsu
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elizabeth Park + Jackie Kim1542% games−11.3% vs expected
Stephanie Hanger + Thu Hoai Yanase033 matchesnot enough data
Yuka McLeod + Jackie Kim123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Andrea Torng
89W–31L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%81%18%
3.87
Elizabeth Park
11W–19L career · no lines in 2024
<1%75%25%
3.41
Jackie Kim
24W–22L career · no lines in 2024
1%88%12%
3.33
Yuka McLeod
16W–11L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.30
3.5
Colleen Johnson
3W–17L career · no lines in 2024
8%90%1%
3.20
Melissa Wolgang
2W–8L career · no lines in 2024
20%79%<1%
3.12
Emily Ashby
28W–22L career · no lines in 2024
30%70%<1%
3.08
Wendy Finster
2W–8L career · no lines in 2024
50%50%<1%
3.00
3
Claudina Mercado
27W–41L career · no lines in 2024
<1%53%47%
2.99
Stephanie Hanger
8W–16L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
2.77
3
Ara Cho
2W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3
Brenda Phongsa
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Thu Hoai Yanase
2W–8L career · no lines in 2024
8%90%1%
2.70
3
Diane Pryzbylo
3W–3L career · no lines in 2024
9%90%1%
2.69
Gabriele Engelhardt
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Kathleen Richter
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Lindsay Newby-Snode
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Yuka Ohtsu
3W–5L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.