Teams

SHC-Welter

2023 Adult 40 & Over · 3.5 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.38 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.18 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.39
Chris van Leeuwen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.33
Ruth Semon
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Singles 29% · published 3.5
3.29
Patricia Eargle
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.26
Kiersten Lake
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.18
Elizabeth Maguire
usually #1 Singles 46%, also #1 Doubles 27% · published 3.5
3.16
Carmen Warda
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.98
Nancy Salisbury
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.87
Amy Thomas
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
Results8 ties
2023-06-11Lost 12
L#1 DoublesPatricia Eargle / Kiersten Lake vs Vicki Blunt / Susan McMullin6-3, 1-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesRuth Semon vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#3 DoublesLaura Berner / Nancy Salisbury vs Heidi Palena / Tamara Phillips6-1, 6-4
2023-06-04Lost 04
L#1 DoublesRobin Welter / Kiersten Lake vs Alison Marr / Angie Urrutia6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesElizabeth Maguire vs Angelina Warriner6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesRuth Semon / Susan Judge vs Sandi Martes / Kaoru Nelson6-7, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLaura Berner / Amy Thomas vs Crystal Miller / Suki Birge6-4, 6-4
2023-06-02Lost 12
W#1 DoublesChris van Leeuwen / Kiersten Lake vs Loo Yah Leong / Shannon Berry5-7, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRobin Welter / Patricia Eargle vs Mary Lowblad / Laura Maginnis6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesElizabeth Maguire / Ruth Semon vs Laurence Dupray / Maryam Farinola6-4, 6-2
2023-05-07Won 20
W#1 DoublesChris van Leeuwen / Kiersten Lake vs Ariana White / KEELEY PLOMBON6-4, 7-5
W#3 DoublesCarmen Warda / Elizabeth Maguire vs Kari Hastings / Maya Mori7-5, 5-7, 1-0
2023-04-29Won 31
W#1 DoublesKiersten Lake / Robin Welter vs Jing Feng / Yu Zhang6-2, 6-2
W#1 SinglesElizabeth Maguire vs Lauren Smith6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLisa Barsotti / Patricia Eargle vs Lyudmila Leissler / Cathleen Lang6-1, 5-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesRuth Semon / Susan Judge vs Kimberly Stockstad / Debbie Frankel6-3, 1-6, 1-0
2023-04-23Won 21
W#1 DoublesKiersten Lake / Chris van Leeuwen vs Heather Zadow / Kimberly Seely2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#1 SinglesRuth Semon vs Sarah Leslie6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesPatricia Eargle / Nancy Salisbury vs Lisa Greenfield / Robyn Hilden6-1, 0-6, 1-0
2023-04-15Won 21
W#1 DoublesKiersten Lake / Chris van Leeuwen vs Lori Bernhardt / Shawn Cellura Radford2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesPatricia Eargle / Ruth Semon vs Alison Davis / Catherine Leedy6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesElizabeth Maguire / Carmen Warda vs Christian Buchholz / Barbra Jorgensen6-4, 6-0
2023-04-07Lost 04
L#1 DoublesLisa Barsotti / Kiersten Lake vs Tina Prassas / Judi Babcock6-1, 7-5
L#1 SinglesElizabeth Maguire vs Maryam Farinola3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRuth Semon / Susan Judge vs Laurence Dupray / Laura Maginnis6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesNancy Salisbury / Patricia Eargle vs Jen Lewis / Nancy Collins6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Chris van Leeuwen
90W–38L career
0%93%7%
3.39
3.5
Ruth Semon
51W–32L career
0%99%1%
3.33
3.5
Patricia Eargle
64W–51L career
1%98%1%
3.29
3.5
Kiersten Lake
75W–60L career
1%98%1%
3.26
3.5
Elizabeth Maguire
78W–42L career
5%95%0%
3.18
3.5
Carmen Warda
68W–35L career
5%95%0%
3.16
3
Nancy Salisbury
58W–46L career
0%82%18%
2.98
3
Amy Thomas
27W–46L career
1%89%10%
2.87

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.