Teams

CORTA/Madison Allen

2025 CORTA USTA Adult 18 & Over - Spring · Women 2.5

11 players · average NTRP 2.75 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-02-08vs Burrage-CCCLost 12
L#1 DoublesRebecca Fleming / Haviland Hollingsworth vs Graehm Helen Oliver / Avery Metzgar1-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesKaitlin Moore vs Cassidy Pearson3-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesKaren Cochran / Kyra Cottle vs Mary Ann Burrage / Zoe Paul6-1, 7-6
2025-02-05vs Burrage-CCCLost 12
L#1 DoublesMadison Allen / Kaitlin Moore vs Libbie Stone / Graehm Helen Oliver2-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesHaviland Hollingsworth vs Cassidy Pearson2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesKatherine Jackson / Vanessa Vero vs Alice Finley / Mary Ann Burrage6-3, 6-3
2025-01-04vs Mercer/Hardy-CCWon 30
W#1 DoublesMadison Allen / Vanessa Vero vs Debra Kirksey / Siobhan Hardy4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#1 SinglesKaitlin Moore vs Paris Gardner6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKatherine Jackson / Rebecca Fleming vs Deidre Hinson / Rawlanda Hercules6-0, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 2.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.50 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.84
Madison Allen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.74
Vanessa Vero
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.72
Haviland Hollingsworth
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
2.60
Kyra Cottle
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.56
Katherine Jackson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.47
Karen Cochran
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.40
Rebecca Fleming
usually #2 Doubles 63%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.37
Kaitlin Moore
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.24
Audra Beaudoin
published 3
2.04
Caroline Womack
published 2.5
Taylor Green
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rebecca Fleming + Katherine Jackson303 matchesnot enough data
Kaitlin Moore + Haviland Hollingsworth213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Madison Allen
41W–17L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%1%99%
2.84
Vanessa Vero
29W–17L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%5%95%
2.74
Haviland Hollingsworth
28W–12L career · 5 lines in 2025
0%6%94%
2.72
Kyra Cottle
36W–18L career · 1 line in 2025
0%25%75%
2.60
Katherine Jackson
14W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%33%67%
2.56
Karen Cochran
15W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
0%58%42%
2.47
Rebecca Fleming
39W–48L career · 8 lines in 2025
0%75%25%
2.40
Kaitlin Moore
17W–14L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%83%17%
2.37
3
Audra Beaudoin
14W–32L career · no lines in 2025
97%3%<1%
2.24
2.5
Caroline Womack
3W–2L career · no lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.04
Taylor Green
7W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.