Teams

ERupert (Queens)

2022 Adult 18 & Over League · 18 & Over Adult 4.0 Women

13 players · average NTRP 4.06 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2022-05-12vs DPagano (Life Time)Won 21
L#1 DoublesHeather Crysler / Wendy Parker vs Cheri King / Amanda Patrocino0-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesJane Sickles vs Bilan Mo6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesPamela Burks / Cynthia Waldrop vs Elly Tennyson / Daniela Pagano6-1, 6-7, 1-0
2022-05-05vs KMeyers (Park Road)Won 30
W#1 DoublesJane Sickles / Susan Sutherland vs Allison Moseley / Christy Haseltine6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesPamela Burks / Elizabeth Heald vs Natalie Lombardi / Van ONeill6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesAnna Hitchins / Rachael Schuler vs Emily Francis / Mitchell Kelling6-1, 6-0
2022-04-28vs LUntener (Queens)Won 20
W#1 DoublesWendy Parker / Rachael Schuler vs Nikki Haskins / Katie Brewer7-5, 6-4
W#3 DoublesXersalyn Threet / Pamela Burks vs Kimberly Burkhamer / Jayde Corley6-2, 6-2
2022-04-21vs MMerchant (Queens)Split 11
L#2 DoublesPamela Burks / Lauren Pruett Strickler vs Eugenia Grow / Joni Smith4-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesJane Sickles / Rachael Schuler vs Sheryl Beaver / Megan Griffin6-7, 6-1, 1-0
2022-04-14vs KHart (Blakeney)Won 20
W#2 DoublesPamela Burks / Amy Redfield vs Neha Bhalla / Holly Bandel6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesWendy Parker / Anna Hitchins vs Sanami Nakai / Cynthia Spera4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2022-04-11vs THolwager (Life Time)Split 11
W#1 DoublesWendy Parker / Rachael Schuler vs Trista Holwager / Anna Kamenova6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 SinglesJane Sickles vs Cameron Green3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2022-04-07vs CGoldblatt/MParker (OPRC)Split 11
W#1 DoublesWendy Parker / Rachael Schuler vs Christina Goldblatt / Michelle Ziewacz6-4, 6-0
L#3 DoublesPamela Burks / Amy Redfield vs Mary Parker / Kimberly Valitchka3-6, 3-6
2022-03-24vs LGignac (Carmel)Won 21
W#1 DoublesWendy Parker / Heather Crysler vs Wendy Rose / Leslie Buben4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 SinglesJane Sickles vs Amie Rucker6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesPamela Burks / Lauren Pruett Strickler vs Amy Elaasar / Paige Whitney5-7, 6-2, 0-1
2022-03-03vs SReynolds (Queens Complex)Won 30
W#1 DoublesWendy Parker / Heather Crysler vs Stefanie Reynolds / Marianne Keaton6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesJane Sickles vs Sophie Graham7-6, 6-0
W#3 DoublesElizabeth Heald / Pamela Burks vs Elizabeth Strack / MacKenzie Roberts6-3, 6-2
2022-02-24vs PDonoghue (Matthews)Won 30
W#1 DoublesWendy Parker / Heather Crysler vs Julie Smallwood / Leila Tissue6-1, 6-0
W#1 SinglesJane Sickles vs Nancy Smith Wells6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesPamela Burks / Amy Redfield vs Tracy Stamey / Julian Black6-0, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Adult 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.77 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Anna Hitchins
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.00
Amy Redfield
published 4
4.00
Xersalyn Threet
published
3.94
Susan Sutherland
published
3.90
Julie Busha
published
3.82
Rachael Schuler
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.71
Jane Sickles
usually #1 Singles 57%, also #2 Singles 14% · published 4
3.64
Heather Crysler
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.63
Cynthia Waldrop
published 4
3.61
Elizabeth Heald
published 4
3.57
Pamela Burks
usually #2 Doubles 56%, also #3 Doubles 44% · published
Wendy Parker
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Pamela Burks + Julie Busha303 matchesnot enough data
Anna Hitchins + Heather Crysler303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Anna Hitchins
96W–51L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Amy Redfield
71W–21L career · no lines in 2022
<1%51%49%
4.00
Xersalyn Threet
11W–10L career · no lines in 2022
51%49%<1%
4.00
Susan Sutherland
26W–5L career · no lines in 2022
<1%66%34%
3.94
Julie Busha
35W–22L career · no lines in 2022
<1%78%22%
3.90
4
Rachael Schuler
298W–157L career · 5 lines in 2022
1%91%9%
3.82
4
Jane Sickles
104W–72L career · 7 lines in 2022
5%93%1%
3.71
4
Heather Crysler
158W–95L career · 7 lines in 2022
14%85%<1%
3.64
4
Cynthia Waldrop
9W–11L career · no lines in 2022
16%84%<1%
3.63
4
Lauren Pruett Strickler
46W–43L career · no lines in 2022
19%81%<1%
3.61
4
Elizabeth Heald
16W–10L career · no lines in 2022
19%81%<1%
3.61
Pamela Burks
207W–133L career · 9 lines in 2022
31%69%<1%
3.57
Wendy Parker
4W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.