Teams

Julington Creek - Bowman

2026 Duval Adult 18 & Over - Men · 3.5 Adult 18 & Over - Men

11 players · average NTRP 3.36 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2026-06-16vs Julington Creek - CarrLost 12
L#1 DoublesForrest Gibson / Steve Tripp vs Alan Belcher / Pedro Enrique Kreitz Martinez2-6, 6-7
W#1 SinglesTim Bell vs Christopher Lynch2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 SinglesAmir Moghaddam vs Jackson Carnaghi6-7, 6-3, 0-1
2026-06-06vs Williams Y - FrickeLost 05
L#1 DoublesForrest Gibson / Derek Smith vs Chuck King / Young Lee0-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesAmir Moghaddam vs Richard Hull3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesDouglas Kastleman / Steve Tripp vs Robert Phillips / Praveen Nair4-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#2 SinglesTim Bell vs Mike Mulvey4-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesJohn Taylor / Dale Redden vs Mark Cabler / Louis Posick1-3
2026-05-30vs FYC - WilliamsLost 01
L#1 DoublesForrest Gibson / Derek Smith vs Brent Henning / John Williams6-7, 3-6
2026-05-19vs Eagle Landing - KnightLost 02
L#2 DoublesTim Bell / Forrest Gibson vs Darron Walton / Jowell Olson3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesDale Redden / Hal Markowitz vs Sanford Aldrich / Roniel Popera1-6, 0-3
2026-05-18vs Duval/McDanielLost 12
L#1 DoublesDerek Smith / Tim Bell vs Lucien Abboud / Ray Williams3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#1 SinglesAmir Moghaddam vs Adam Mercer7-6, 7-5
L#3 DoublesForrest Gibson / Douglas Kastleman vs Neal McDaniel / Christopher Lane5-7, 6-2, 0-1
2026-05-06vs Timuquana - HemphillLost 05
L#1 DoublesDerek Smith / Steve Tripp vs Billy Hutchinson II / Emmett Glasgow1-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesRandy STUDT vs Eddie Kiep4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesDouglas Kastleman / Forrest Gibson vs Derek Hyatt / Peter Hunt2-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesTim Bell vs Philip Shad4-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesDale Redden / John Taylor vs David Hemphill / Madison Behrens1-6, 1-6
2026-04-25vs Marsh Creek - HolubLost 01
L#1 DoublesDerek Smith / Adrian Fusinaz vs Gene Greiner / Jonathan Eric Hill3-6, 2-6
2026-04-11vs Queens Harbour - CohenLost 13
L#1 DoublesTim Bell / Douglas Kastleman vs Jonathan Meer / Michael O'Rourke0-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesAmir Moghaddam vs Michael Kreinest3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesDerek Smith / Adrian Fusinaz vs Arthur Hughes / Joseph Leeba6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesHal Markowitz / Dale Redden vs Sean Clancy / Bob Peaslee2-6, 1-6
2026-04-09vs Treaty Park - VenkatramaLost 13
L#1 DoublesDouglas Kastleman / Dale Redden vs Sathish Kumar Ingersal / Praveen Subramanian2-6, 5-7
L#1 SinglesTim Bell vs Sathiyaseelan Madhappan1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesAdrian Fusinaz / Derek Smith vs Aravindan Anbazhagan / Thomas Stephen6-7, 3-6
W#3 DoublesSteve Tripp / Forrest Gibson vs Krishna Venkatrama / KUMARESAN NATARAJAN6-2, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Adult 18 & Over - Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.17 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.40
Tim Bell
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
3.32
Forrest Gibson
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.28
Adrian Fusinaz
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.27
Amir Moghaddam
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.23
Douglas Kastleman
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.19
Steve Tripp
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.18
Derek Smith
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
2.96
Hal Markowitz
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.66
Dale Redden
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Peter Bowman
published
Randy STUDT
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Hal Markowitz + Forrest Gibson5155% gamesnot enough data
Derek Smith + Forrest Gibson033 matchesnot enough data
Derek Smith + Adrian Fusinaz123 matchesnot enough data
Steve Tripp + Dale Redden303 matchesnot enough data
Douglas Kastleman + Dale Redden123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tim Bell
23W–16L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%77%23%
3.40
3.5
Forrest Gibson
16W–21L career · 7 lines in 2026
1%91%8%
3.32
3.5
Adrian Fusinaz
5W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.28
3.5
Amir Moghaddam
6W–11L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Douglas Kastleman
7W–26L career · 5 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
3.23
Steve Tripp
10W–21L career · 4 lines in 2026
7%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Derek Smith
4W–25L career · 7 lines in 2026
9%91%1%
3.18
3
Hal Markowitz
15W–19L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%62%38%
2.96
3
Dale Redden
15W–22L career · 6 lines in 2026
10%89%<1%
2.66
Peter Bowman
0W–3L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Randy STUDT
0W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.