Teams

CoplanC

OBX MIXED 40 & OVER · 3.5 MIXED

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2026-08-03vs Dave CoplanSplit 11
W#1 DoublesChristine Coplan / Brian Rubino vs Russ Sarbora / Lisa Ammons3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesTom Acree / Lindsey Harfst vs Robert Gomez / Vikki Thompson7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2026-07-27vs Dave CoplanLost 12
W#1 DoublesChristine Coplan / Nicholas Stathis vs Brooke Samson / Russ Sarbora6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesLindsey Harfst / Bo Rhodes vs Steve Thompson / Robin Morris0-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesMarina Turner / Tom Acree vs John del Vecchio / Vikki Thompson6-2, 4-6, 0-1
2026-07-20vs Dave CoplanLost 12
L#1 DoublesSharon Sawyer / Brian Rubino vs Vikki Thompson / Steve Thompson4-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesLinda Vlahos / David Hurley vs David Coplan / Andrea Watkins4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesMarina Turner / Tom Acree vs Kevin McKeever / Stephanie Wills6-1, 6-4
2026-07-13vs Dave CoplanWon 21
W#1 DoublesChristine Coplan / Nicholas Stathis vs Steve Thompson / Andrea Watkins7-6, 6-1
L#2 DoublesTom Acree / Sharon Sawyer vs David Coplan / Stephanie Wills3-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesBo Rhodes / Karyl Rhodes vs Clare Absher / Robert Gomez6-3, 6-1
2026-06-29vs Dave CoplanWon 21
L#1 DoublesMarina Turner / Brian Rubino vs Andrea Watkins / Russ Sarbora7-6, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesTianna Stathis / Nicholas Stathis vs Stephanie Wills / David Coplan6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesSharon Sawyer / Gregory Wills vs Lisa Ammons / Kevin McKeever6-4, 7-5
2026-06-22vs Dave CoplanLost 12
L#1 DoublesLindsey Harfst / Nicholas Stathis vs Brooke Samson / Steve Thompson5-7, 4-6
W#2 DoublesChristine Coplan / David Hurley vs Robin Morris / John del Vecchio6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesKaryl Rhodes / Gregory Wills vs Lisa Ammons / David Coplan0-6, 2-6
2026-06-15vs Dave CoplanLost 03
L#1 DoublesMarina Turner / Nicholas Stathis vs Brooke Samson / Russ Sarbora4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesSharon Sawyer / Brian Rubino vs Andrea Watkins / Steve Thompson3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesChristine Coplan / Gregory Wills vs Clare Absher / Robert Gomez7-6, 6-7, 0-1
2026-06-08vs Dave CoplanLost 02
L#1 DoublesBo Rhodes / Lindsey Harfst vs David Coplan / Vikki Thompson3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesGregory Wills / Karyl Rhodes vs Robert Gomez / Clare Absher6-7, 5-7
2026-06-01vs Dave CoplanWon 30
W#1 DoublesNicholas Stathis / Marina Turner vs Brooke Samson / Russ Sarbora6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesChristine Coplan / Brian Rubino vs Vikki Thompson / Robert Gomez6-3, 6-0
W#3 DoublesGregory Wills / Linda Vlahos vs Lisa Ammons / Kevin McKeever7-5, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 3.5 MIXED
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Dave Coplan54151229262
2CoplanC45121531256

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.31 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.63
Nicholas Stathis
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
3.53
Brian Rubino
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.48
Christine Coplan
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.44
Marina Turner
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.36
David Hurley
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.34
Tom Acree
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.31
Bo Rhodes
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.27
Linda Vlahos
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.19
Karyl Rhodes
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.14
Gregory Wills
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.13
Lindsey Harfst
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.85
Tianna Stathis
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Karyl Rhodes + Bo Rhodes224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Nicholas Stathis
24W–9L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%16%84%
3.63
3.5
Brian Rubino
35W–22L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%40%60%
3.53
3.5
Christine Coplan
26W–17L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%57%43%
3.48
Marina Turner
20W–19L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%68%32%
3.44
3.5
David Hurley
17W–14L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%85%14%
3.36
Tom Acree
41W–18L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%88%11%
3.34
3.5
Bo Rhodes
32W–24L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%91%8%
3.31
Linda Vlahos
17W–14L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.27
Karyl Rhodes
18W–19L career · 3 lines in 2026
7%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Gregory Wills
15W–42L career · 5 lines in 2026
14%86%<1%
3.14
Lindsey Harfst
21W–17L career · 4 lines in 2026
16%84%<1%
3.13
Tianna Stathis
36W–16L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%87%13%
2.85

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.