Teams

6 TDC Shafer

2022 Richmond Adult 40 & Over Weekend · Richmond Adult 40 & Over 4.5 Men

15 players · average NTRP 4.30 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2022-07-24Lost 01
L#1 SinglesStuart Fulcher vs Travis Miller1-6, 2-6
2022-07-03Lost 01
L#3 DoublesStuart Fulcher / Michael Shafer vs Terry Jahn / Eric Spivack2-6, 3-6
2022-06-19vs 5 Avalon Miller Balloon FingersWon 10
W#2 DoublesStuart Fulcher / Michael Shafer vs Cary Broocks / William Carli3-6, 7-5, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 40 & Over 4.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.02 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.31
David Lefkowitz
published 4.5
4.23
Tom Bryan
published
4.23
Ryan Baker
published
4.21
Richard Godsey
published
4.15
Gary Farrar
published 4.5
4.14
Stuart Fulcher
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.05
Robert Clarkson
published
4.00
Joseph Cappellino
published
3.95
Michael Shafer
published
3.80
Scott Sorkin
published
3.79
Charles Stafford
published 4
3.76
Rafael Lugo
published
3.69
Charles Cosby
published 4
Prabir Purohit
published
Will Kaufmann
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tom Bryan + Gary Farrar4161% games+2.2% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
David Lefkowitz
10W–5L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
4.31
Tom Bryan
9W–8L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
4.23
Ryan Baker
29W–11L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
4.23
Richard Godsey
8W–0L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%1%
4.21
4.5
Gary Farrar
7W–3L career · no lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
4.15
4.5
Stuart Fulcher
149W–170L career · 3 lines in 2022
14%86%<1%
4.14
Robert Clarkson
0W–3L career · no lines in 2022
34%66%<1%
4.05
Joseph Cappellino
2W–4L career · no lines in 2022
50%50%<1%
4.00
Michael Shafer
0W–5L career · no lines in 2022
64%36%<1%
3.95
Scott Sorkin
6W–8L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.80
4
Charles Stafford
14W–9L career · no lines in 2022
1%94%5%
3.79
Rafael Lugo
3W–2L career · no lines in 2022
97%3%<1%
3.76
4
Charles Cosby
8W–8L career · no lines in 2022
8%92%1%
3.69
Prabir Purohit
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Will Kaufmann
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.