Teams

Pulley/Nashville

2022 Combo 55 & Over - Nashville · 6.5 Women - WED AM

16 players · average NTRP 3.50 / TENNESSEE

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 6.5 Women - WED AM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.99 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.61
Stacy Miller
published
3.55
Stacy Thomas
published
3.36
Adelaide Geer
published 3.5
3.21
Angie Howard
published 3.5
3.14
Mary Agee
published
3.11
Susan Furman
published
2.90
Kim Bright
published
2.88
Patricia Franks
published
2.81
Veronica Pulley
published
2.76
Linda Ashford
published
2.73
Becky Morgan
published 3.5
2.71
Laurie Farris
published
2.61
Karen Vasil
published
2.53
Kitty Boyte McKee
published
Sydney DeWitt
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Laurie Farris + Kim Bright033 matchesnot enough data
Veronica Pulley + Angie Howard123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Stacy Miller
10W–3L career · no lines in 2022
19%81%<1%
3.61
Stacy Thomas
20W–30L career · no lines in 2022
36%64%<1%
3.55
3.5
Christine Toriscelli
22W–13L career · no lines in 2022
<1%85%15%
3.36
3.5
Adelaide Geer
2W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Angie Howard
14W–27L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.21
Mary Agee
6W–11L career · no lines in 2022
14%86%<1%
3.14
Susan Furman
11W–16L career · no lines in 2022
20%80%<1%
3.11
Kim Bright
20W–29L career · no lines in 2022
<1%77%23%
2.90
Patricia Franks
11W–13L career · no lines in 2022
<1%82%17%
2.88
Veronica Pulley
18W–25L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
2.81
Linda Ashford
3W–10L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%3%
2.76
3.5
Becky Morgan
2W–10L career · type S · no lines in 2022
98%2%<1%
2.73
Laurie Farris
4W–15L career · no lines in 2022
5%93%1%
2.71
Karen Vasil
13W–36L career · no lines in 2022
20%80%<1%
2.61
Kitty Boyte McKee
4W–9L career · no lines in 2022
41%59%<1%
2.53
Sydney DeWitt
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.