Teams

RCCB - Vickers

2026 Brevard Adult 18 & Over · 3.5 Adult 18 & Over - Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.36 / REGION_4

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-06-08vs EFSC - UrbanWon 10
W#1 DoublesMegan Holthaus / Michele Heyn vs Gisela Alcalde / Cynthia Simmons4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-05-18vs Viera Regional Park - RuetherLost 13
L#1 DoublesCatherine Grainger / Michele Heyn vs Nancy Charitat / Lyuda Saks4-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesDevlin Deveney vs Brooke Boss6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesDEE MANUEL / Diana Hayslip vs Michelle Ruether / Heather Harris1-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesBrittany Reiter / Melissa Vickers vs Dana Saunders / Danielle Hyatt1-6, 6-4, 0-1
2026-05-11vs EFSC - LeiterWon 10
W#2 DoublesBrittany Reiter / Michele Heyn vs June Leiter / Sandy Dahl6-2, 7-6
2026-04-27vs Fee - WoodsWon 21
W#1 DoublesAngela Duckworth / Michele Heyn vs Carol Bennett / Renee Jiannine6-4, 6-3
W#1 SinglesDevlin Deveney vs Sandee Reich7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMegan Holthaus / Melissa Vickers vs Deborah Phillips / Samantha Swaggerty4-6, 4-6
2026-04-18vs Kiwi - FamianoWon 10
W#2 DoublesMichele Heyn / Megan Holthaus vs Tracey Draper / Valerie Baldwin6-3, 6-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Adult 18 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.17 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.47
Angela Duckworth
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.41
Michele Heyn
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.23
DEE MANUEL
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.23
Catherine Grainger
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.20
Sue Lutter
published
3.20
Diana Hayslip
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.20
Tinara Choing
published
3.10
Devlin Deveney
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
3.01
Brittany Reiter
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.94
Melissa Vickers
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.87
Megan Holthaus
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brittany Reiter + Megan Holthaus134 matchesnot enough data
Megan Holthaus + Diana Hayslip303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Angela Duckworth
8W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%58%42%
3.47
3.5
Michele Heyn
109W–104L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%73%27%
3.41
3.5
DEE MANUEL
11W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Catherine Grainger
4W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
5%92%3%
3.23
Sue Lutter
20W–6L career · no lines in 2026
<1%8%92%
3.20
3.5
Diana Hayslip
10W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
8%91%2%
3.20
Tinara Choing
1W–9L career · no lines in 2026
8%90%1%
3.20
3
Devlin Deveney
12W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%25%75%
3.10
3
Brittany Reiter
11W–15L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%46%54%
3.01
Melissa Vickers
20W–13L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%65%35%
2.94
Megan Holthaus
7W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%81%18%
2.87

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.